Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Eye movements in strategic choice

Stewart, Neil; Gaechter, Simon; Noguchi, Takao; Mullett, Timothy L.

Eye movements in strategic choice Thumbnail


Authors

Neil Stewart

SIMON GAECHTER simon.gaechter@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor, Psychology of Economic Decision Making

Takao Noguchi

Timothy L. Mullett



Abstract

In risky and other multiattribute choices, the process of choosing is well described by random walk or drift diffusion models in which evidence is accumulated over time to threshold. In strategic choices, level-k and cognitive hierarchy models have been offered as accounts of the choice process, in which people simulate the choice processes of their opponents or partners. We recorded the eye movements in 2 × 2 symmetric games including dominance-solvable games like prisoner's dilemma and asymmetric coordination games like stag hunt and hawk–dove. The evidence was most consistent with the accumulation of payoff differences over time: we found longer duration choices with more fixations when payoffs differences were more finely balanced, an emerging bias to gaze more at the payoffs for the action ultimately chosen, and that a simple count of transitions between payoffs—whether or not the comparison is strategically informative—was strongly associated with the final choice. The accumulator models do account for these strategic choice process measures, but the level-k and cognitive hierarchy models do not.

Citation

Stewart, N., Gaechter, S., Noguchi, T., & Mullett, T. L. (2016). Eye movements in strategic choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(2-3), https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1901

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 30, 2015
Online Publication Date Oct 29, 2015
Publication Date Mar 28, 2016
Deposit Date Jan 13, 2016
Publicly Available Date Jan 13, 2016
Journal Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Print ISSN 0894-3257
Electronic ISSN 1099-0771
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 29
Issue 2-3
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1901
Keywords eye tracking, process tracing, experimental games, normal-form games, prisoner's dilemma, stag hunt, hawk–dove, level-k, cognitive hierarchy, drift diffusion, accumulator models, gaze cascade effect, gaze bias effect
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/778981
Publisher URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.1901/abstract

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations