Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Boyle, Robert J.; Ierodiakonou, Despo; Khan, Tasnia; Chivinge, Jennifer; Robinson, Zoe; Geoghegan, Natalie; Jarrold, Katherine; Afxentiou, Thalia; Reeves, Tim; Cunha, Sergio; Trivella, Marialena; Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa; Leonardi-Bee, Jo

Authors

Robert J. Boyle

Despo Ierodiakonou

Tasnia Khan

Jennifer Chivinge

Zoe Robinson

Natalie Geoghegan

Katherine Jarrold

Thalia Afxentiou

Tim Reeves

Sergio Cunha

Marialena Trivella

Vanessa Garcia-Larsen

JO LEONARDI-BEE jo.leonardi-bee@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology



Abstract

© BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2016. Objective To determine whether feeding infants with hydrolysed formula reduces their risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis, as part of a series of systematic reviews commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency to inform guidelines on infant feeding. Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data sources Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and LILACS searched between January 1946 and April 2015. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective intervention trials of hydrolysed cows- milk formula compared with another hydrolysed formula, human breast milk, or a standard cows- milk formula, which reported on allergic or autoimmune disease or allergic sensitisation. Results 37 eligible intervention trials of hydrolysed formula were identified, including over 19 000 participants. There was evidence of conflict of interest and high or unclear risk of bias in most studies of allergic outcomes and evidence of publication bias for studies of eczema and wheeze. Overall there was no consistent evidence that partially or extensively hydrolysed formulas reduce risk of allergic or autoimmune outcomes in infants at high pre-existing risk of these outcomes. Odds ratios for eczema at age 0-4, compared with standard cows- milk formula, were 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.07; I2=30%) for partially hydrolysed formula; 0.55 (0.28 to 1.09; I2=74%) for extensively hydrolysed casein based formula; and 1.12 (0.88 to 1.42; I2=0%) for extensively hydrolysed whey based formula. There was no evidence to support the health claim approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that a partially hydrolysed formula could reduce the risk of eczema nor the conclusion of the Cochrane review that hydrolysed formula could prevent allergy to cows- milk. Conclusion These findings do not support current guidelines that recommend the use of hydrolysed formula to prevent allergic disease in high risk infants. Review registration PROSPERO CRD42013004252.

Citation

Boyle, R. J., Ierodiakonou, D., Khan, T., Chivinge, J., Robinson, Z., Geoghegan, N., …Leonardi-Bee, J. (2016). Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 352, Article i974. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i974

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 30, 2016
Online Publication Date Mar 8, 2016
Publication Date Mar 8, 2016
Deposit Date Aug 21, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jan 18, 2019
Journal BMJ
Print ISSN 0959-8138
Electronic ISSN 1756-1833
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 352
Article Number i974
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i974
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1112733
Publisher URL https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i974
PMID 26956579