Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Anaesthesia workload measurement devices: qualitative systematic review

Almghairbi, Dalal S.; Marufu, Takawira C.; Moppett, Iain K.

Anaesthesia workload measurement devices: qualitative systematic review Thumbnail


Authors

Dalal S. Almghairbi

Takawira C. Marufu

IAIN MOPPETT iain.moppett@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine



Abstract

Background: Management of mental workload is a key aspect of safety in anaesthesia but there is no gold standard tool to assess mental workload, risking confusion in clinical and research use of such tools.

Objective: This review assessed currently used mental workload assessment tools.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on the following electronic databases; Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Screening and data extraction were performed individually by two authors. We included primary published papers focusing on mental workload assessment tools in anaesthesia.

Results: A total of 2331 studies were screened by title, 32 at full text and twenty - four studies met the inclusion criteria. Six mental workload measurement tools were observed across included studies. Reliability for the Borg rating scales and Vibrotactile device were reported in two individual studies. The rest of the studies did not record reliability of the tool measurements used. Borg rating scales, NASA-TLX and task oriented mental work load measurements are subjective, easily available, readily accessible and takes a few minutes to complete. However, the Vibrotactile and Eye-tracking methods are objective, require more technical involvement, considerable time for the investigator, and moderately expensive, impacting their potential use.

Conclusion: We found that, the measurement of mental workload in anaesthesia is an emerging field supporting patient and anaesthetist safety. The self - reported measures have the best evidence base

Citation

Almghairbi, D. S., Marufu, T. C., & Moppett, I. K. (2018). Anaesthesia workload measurement devices: qualitative systematic review. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(3), 112-116. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000263

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 24, 2018
Online Publication Date Mar 21, 2018
Publication Date Jul 31, 2018
Deposit Date Feb 27, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 22, 2019
Journal BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
Electronic ISSN 2056-6697
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 4
Issue 3
Pages 112-116
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000263
Keywords Workload; Over load; Anaesthesia; Anaesthetist
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/948083
Publisher URL http://stel.bmj.com/content/early/2018/03/21/bmjstel-2017-000263

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations