Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Recovery, responsiveness and interpretability of patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for Dupuytren’s disease

Rodrigues, J.N.; Zhang, W.; Scammell, Brigitte E.; Davidson, D.; Fullilove, S.; Chakrabarti, I.; Russell, P.G.; Davies, T.R.C.

Authors

J.N. Rodrigues

W. Zhang

Brigitte E. Scammell

D. Davidson

S. Fullilove

I. Chakrabarti

P.G. Russell

T.R.C. Davies



Abstract

This prospective cohort study investigated the responsiveness and interpretability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) outcome measures for assessing recovery after fasciectomy and dermofasciectomy for Dupuytren’s disease. DASH outcome scores at 1 year were significantly better than at 6 weeks, suggesting that recovery is not complete by 6 weeks. Of the 101 patients recruited to the DASH cohort, 71 completed preoperative, 6 week and 1 year postoperative DASH scores; 68 of them completed preoperative and 1 year postoperative DASH scores and an external anchor question. In the URAM cohort, 30/44 completed the preoperative and the 1 year postoperative URAM scores and the anchor question. The DASH score exhibited moderate responsiveness but poor interpretability on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, such that a minimal important change could not be estimated. The URAM score showed acceptable responsiveness, and an MIC of 10.5 on receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Citation

Rodrigues, J., Zhang, W., Scammell, B. E., Davidson, D., Fullilove, S., Chakrabarti, I., …Davies, T. (2016). Recovery, responsiveness and interpretability of patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for Dupuytren’s disease. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 42(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416677712

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 8, 2016
Publication Date Nov 20, 2016
Deposit Date May 9, 2017
Journal Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Print ISSN 1753-1934
Electronic ISSN 2043-6289
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 42
Issue 3
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416677712
Keywords Dupuytren’s contracture, Dupuytren’s disease, Patient-reported outcome measures, DASH, URAM,
responsiveness, interpretability, minimal important difference, minimal important change
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/827860
Publisher URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1753193416677712

Downloadable Citations