Daniele Nosenzo
Discretionary sanctions and rewards in the repeated inspection game
Nosenzo, Daniele; Offerman, Theo; Sefton, Martin; Veen, Ailko van der
Authors
Theo Offerman
Professor MARTIN SEFTON MARTIN.SEFTON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS
Ailko van der Veen
Abstract
We experimentally investigate a repeated “inspection game” where, in the stage game, an employee can either work or shirk and an employer simultaneously chooses to inspect or not inspect. The unique equilibrium of the stage game is in mixed strategies with positive probabilities of shirking/inspecting while combined payoffs are maximized when the employee works and the employer does not inspect. We examine the effects of allowing the employer discretion to sanction or reward the employee after observing stage game payoffs. When employers have limited discretion, and can only apply sanctions and/or rewards following an inspection, we find that both instruments are equally effective in reducing shirking and increasing joint earnings. When employers have discretion to reward and/or sanction independently of whether they inspect we find that rewards are more effective than sanctions. In treatments where employers can combine sanctions and rewards employers rely mainly on rewards and outcomes closely resemble those of treatments where only rewards are possible.
Citation
Nosenzo, D., Offerman, T., Sefton, M., & Veen, A. V. D. (in press). Discretionary sanctions and rewards in the repeated inspection game. Management Science, 62(2), https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2124
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 21, 2014 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 19, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Sep 3, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 3, 2015 |
Journal | Management Science |
Print ISSN | 0025-1909 |
Electronic ISSN | 1526-5501 |
Publisher | INFORMS |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 62 |
Issue | 2 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2124 |
Keywords | Inspection game; Costly monitoring; Discretionary incentives; Rewards; Punishment; Experiment |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/754102 |
Publisher URL | http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2124 |
Contract Date | Sep 3, 2015 |
Files
mnsc.2014.2124.pdf
(651 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
You might also like
High BMP7 expression is associated with poor prognosis in ovarian cancer
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search