Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Improving junior doctor medicine prescribing and patient safety: an intervention using personalised, structured, video?enhanced feedback and deliberate practice

Green, William; Shahzad, Muhammad Waseem; Wood, Stephen; Martinez Martinez, Maria; Baines, Andrew; Navid, Ahmad; Jay, Robert; Whysall, Zara; Sandars, John; Patel, Rakesh

Improving junior doctor medicine prescribing and patient safety: an intervention using personalised, structured, video?enhanced feedback and deliberate practice Thumbnail


Authors

William Green

Muhammad Waseem Shahzad

Stephen Wood

Maria Martinez Martinez

Andrew Baines

Ahmad Navid

Robert Jay

Zara Whysall

John Sandars

Rakesh Patel



Abstract

Aims

This research investigated the effectiveness of an intervention for improving the prescribing and patient safety behaviour among Foundation Year doctors. The intervention consisted of simulated clinical encounters with subsequent personalised, structured, video?enhanced feedback and deliberate practice, undertaken at the start of four?month sub?specialty rotations.

Methods

Three prospective, non?randomised control intervention studies were conducted, within two secondary care NHS Trusts in England. The primary outcome measure, error rate per prescriber, was calculated using daily prescribing data. Prescribers were grouped to enable a comparison between experimental and control conditions using regression analysis. A break?even analysis evaluated cost?effectiveness.

Results

There was no significant difference in error rates of novice prescribers who received the intervention when compared with those of experienced prescribers. Novice prescribers not participating in the intervention had significantly higher error rates (P = .026, 95% confidence interval [CI] Wald 0.093 to 1.436; P = .026, 95% CI 0.031 to 0.397) and patients seen by them experienced significantly higher prescribing error rates (P = .007, 95% CI 0.025 to 0.157). Conversely, patients seen by the novice prescribers who received the intervention experienced a significantly lower rate of significant errors compared to patients seen by the experienced prescribers (P = .04, 95% CI ?0.068 to ?0.001). The break?even analysis demonstrates cost?effectiveness for the intervention.

Conclusion

Simulated clinical encounters using personalised, structured, video?enhanced feedback and deliberate practice improves the prescribing and patient safety behaviour of Foundation Year doctors. The intervention is cost?effective with potential to reduce avoidable harm.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 26, 2020
Online Publication Date Apr 28, 2020
Publication Date 2020-11
Deposit Date May 18, 2020
Publicly Available Date May 19, 2020
Journal British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Print ISSN 0306-5251
Electronic ISSN 1365-2125
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 86
Issue 11
Pages 2234-2246
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14325
Keywords Pharmacology (medical); Pharmacology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4464810
Publisher URL https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bcp.14325

Files





Downloadable Citations