Rebecca Lloyd
Characteristics of positive feedback provided by UK health service users: content analysis of examples from two databases
Lloyd, Rebecca; Slade, Mike; Byng, Richard; Russell, Alex; Ng, Fiona; Stirzaker, Alex; Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan
Authors
Professor MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF MENTAL HEALTH RECOVERY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION
Richard Byng
Alex Russell
Dr FIONA NG FIONA.NG@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Principal Research Fellow
Alex Stirzaker
Dr STEFAN RENNICK EGGLESTONE stefan.egglestone@nottingham.ac.uk
Principal Research Fellow
Abstract
Background: Most feedback received by health services is positive. Our systematic scoping review mapped all available empirical evidence for how positive patient feedback creates healthcare change. Most included papers did not provide specific details on positive feedback characteristics. Objectives: Describe positive feedback characteristics by (1) developing heuristics for identifying positive feedback; (2) sharing annotated feedback examples; (3) describing their positive content. Methods: 200 items were selected from two contrasting databases: (1) https://careopinion.org.uk/; (2) National Health Service (NHS) Friends and Family Test data collected by an NHS trust. Preliminary heuristics and positive feedback categories were developed from a small convenience sample, and iteratively refined. Results: Categories were identified: positive-only; mixed; narrative; factual; grateful. We propose a typology describing tone (positive-only, mixed), form (factual, narrative) and intent (grateful). Separating positive and negative elements in mixed feedback was sometimes impossible due to ambiguity. Narrative feedback often described the cumulative impact of interactions with healthcare providers, healthcare professionals, influential individuals and community organisations. Grateful feedback was targeted at individual staff or entire units, but the target was sometimes ambiguous. Conclusion: People commissioning feedback collection systems should consider mechanisms to maximise utility by limiting ambiguity. Since being enabled to provide narrative feedback can allow contributors to make contextualised statements about what worked for them and why, then there may be trade-offs to negotiate between limiting ambiguity, and encouraging rich narratives. Groups tasked with using feedback should plan the human resources needed for careful inspection, and consider providing narrative analysis training.
Citation
Lloyd, R., Slade, M., Byng, R., Russell, A., Ng, F., Stirzaker, A., & Rennick-Egglestone, S. (2024). Characteristics of positive feedback provided by UK health service users: content analysis of examples from two databases. BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 31(1), Article e101113. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101113
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 26, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 17, 2024 |
Publication Date | Sep 17, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Aug 28, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 28, 2024 |
Journal | BMJ Health & Care Informatics |
Electronic ISSN | 2632-1009 |
Publisher | BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 31 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | e101113 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101113 |
Keywords | Patient-centred care; Audit and feedback; Healthcare quality improvement; Heath services research; Quality improvement methodologies |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/38905542 |
Publisher URL | https://informatics.bmj.com/content/31/1/e101113 |
Files
BMJ H&I 2024 POSITIVE content analysis
(224 Kb)
PDF
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
The potential of citizen mental health science
(2024)
Report
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search