Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Characteristics of positive feedback provided by UK health service users: content analysis of examples from two databases

Lloyd, Rebecca; Slade, Mike; Byng, Richard; Russell, Alex; Ng, Fiona; Stirzaker, Alex; Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan

Characteristics of positive feedback provided by UK health service users: content analysis of examples from two databases Thumbnail


Authors

Rebecca Lloyd

MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Mental Health Recovery and Social Inclusion

Richard Byng

Alex Russell

Profile image of FIONA NG

DR FIONA NG FIONA.NG@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Principal Research Fellow

Alex Stirzaker



Abstract

Background Most feedback received by health services is positive. Our systematic scoping review mapped all available empirical evidence for how positive patient feedback creates healthcare change. Most included papers did not provide specific details on positive feedback characteristics.

Objectives Describe positive feedback characteristics by (1) developing heuristics for identifying positive feedback; (2) sharing annotated feedback examples; (3) describing their positive content.

Methods 200 items were selected from two contrasting databases: (1) https://careopinion.org.uk/; (2) National Health Service (NHS) Friends and Family Test data collected by an NHS trust. Preliminary heuristics and positive feedback categories were developed from a small convenience sample, and iteratively refined.

Results Categories were identified: positive-only; mixed; narrative; factual; grateful. We propose a typology describing tone (positive-only, mixed), form (factual, narrative) and intent (grateful). Separating positive and negative elements in mixed feedback was sometimes impossible due to ambiguity. Narrative feedback often described the cumulative impact of interactions with healthcare providers, healthcare professionals, influential individuals and community organisations. Grateful feedback was targeted at individual staff or entire units, but the target was sometimes ambiguous.

Conclusion People commissioning feedback collection systems should consider mechanisms to maximise utility by limiting ambiguity. Since being enabled to provide narrative feedback can allow contributors to make contextualised statements about what worked for them and why, then there may be trade-offs to negotiate between limiting ambiguity, and encouraging rich narratives. Groups tasked with using feedback should plan the human resources needed for careful inspection, and consider providing narrative analysis training.

Citation

Lloyd, R., Slade, M., Byng, R., Russell, A., Ng, F., Stirzaker, A., & Rennick-Egglestone, S. (2024). Characteristics of positive feedback provided by UK health service users: content analysis of examples from two databases. BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 31(1), Article e101113. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101113

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 26, 2024
Online Publication Date Sep 17, 2024
Publication Date 2024
Deposit Date Aug 28, 2024
Publicly Available Date Aug 28, 2024
Journal BMJ Health & Care Informatics
Electronic ISSN 2632-1009
Publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 31
Issue 1
Article Number e101113
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101113
Keywords Patient-centred care; Audit and feedback; Healthcare quality improvement; Heath services research; Quality improvement methodologies
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/38905542
Publisher URL https://informatics.bmj.com/content/31/1/e101113

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations