Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Healing Houses systematic review: design, sustainability, opportunities and barriers facing Soteria and peer respite development

Yeo, Caroline; Charles, Ashleigh; Lewandowski, Felix; Lichtenberg, Pesach; Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan; Slade, Mike; Tang, Yue; Voronka, Jijian; Rodrigues, Lucelia

Healing Houses systematic review: design, sustainability, opportunities and barriers facing Soteria and peer respite development Thumbnail


Authors

Ashleigh Charles

Felix Lewandowski

Pesach Lichtenberg

MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Mental Health Recovery and Social Inclusion

YUE TANG yue.tang@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor

Jijian Voronka



Abstract

Background: Soteria houses and peer respites, collectively called Healing Houses, are alternatives to psychiatric hospitalisation. Aims: The aim of this research is to review Healing Houses in relation to design characteristics (architectural and service), sustainability and development opportunities and barriers. Methods: This systematic review followed a PROSPERO protocol (CRD42022378089). Articles were identified from journal database searches, hand searching websites, Google Scholar searches, expert consultation and backwards and forward citation searches. Results: Eight hundred and forty-nine documents were screened in three languages (English, German and Hebrew) and 45 documents were included from seven countries. The review highlights 11 architectural design characteristics (atmosphere, size, soft room, history, location, outdoor space, cleanliness, interior design, facilities, staff only areas and accessibility), six service design characteristics (guiding principles, living and working together, consensual treatment, staff, supporting personal meaning making and power), five opportunities (outcomes, human rights, economics, hospitalization and underserved) and four types of barriers (clinical, economic and regulatory, societal and ideological). The primary sustainability issue was long-term funding. Conclusion: Future research should focus on operationalizing a “home-like” atmosphere and the impact of design features such as green spaces on wellbeing of staff and service users. Future research could also produce design guidelines for Healing Houses.

Citation

Yeo, C., Charles, A., Lewandowski, F., Lichtenberg, P., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Slade, M., Tang, Y., Voronka, J., & Rodrigues, L. (in press). Healing Houses systematic review: design, sustainability, opportunities and barriers facing Soteria and peer respite development. Journal of Mental Health, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2361233

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 15, 2024
Online Publication Date Jul 16, 2024
Deposit Date Apr 17, 2024
Publicly Available Date Jul 17, 2025
Journal Journal of Mental Health
Print ISSN 0963-8237
Electronic ISSN 1360-0567
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Pages 1-12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2361233
Keywords Psychosis; hospitalisation; Soteria houses; peer respites
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/33830515
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2024.2361233
Additional Information Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=ijmh20; Received: 2023-10-03; Accepted: 2024-04-15; Published: 2024-07-16

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations