Dr FIONA NG FIONA.NG@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Principal Research Fellow
Pragmatic, feasibility randomized controlled trial of a recorded mental health recovery narrative intervention: narrative experiences online intervention for informal carers (NEON-C)
Ng, Fiona; Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan; Onwumere, Juliana; Newby, Christopher; Llewellyn-Beardsley, Joy; Yeo, Caroline; Ali, Yasmin; Pollock, Kristian; Kotera, Yasuhiro; Pomberth, Scott; Gavan, Sean P.; van der Krieke, Lian; Robotham, Dan; Gillard, Steve; Thornicroft, Graham; Slade, Mike
Authors
Dr STEFAN RENNICK EGGLESTONE stefan.egglestone@nottingham.ac.uk
Principal Research Fellow
Juliana Onwumere
Dr CHRISTOPHER NEWBY Christopher.Newby@nottingham.ac.uk
SENIOR QUANTITATIVE METHODS ADVISER AND RESEARCHER
Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley
Dr CAROLINE FOX Caroline.Fox@nottingham.ac.uk
ANNE MCLAREN FELLOW
Yasmin Ali
Kristian Pollock
Dr YASUHIRO KOTERA YASUHIRO.KOTERA@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Scott Pomberth
Sean P. Gavan
Lian van der Krieke
Dan Robotham
Steve Gillard
Graham Thornicroft
Professor MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF MENTAL HEALTH RECOVERY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION
Abstract
Introduction: Informal carers of people with mental health problems often have unmet support needs. Mental health recovery narratives are increasingly accessible, but their relevance to and effect on informal carers have been minimally investigated. The Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention is a first-in-field intervention that provides informal carers with access to a diverse collection of recorded mental health recovery narratives. This trial aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the NEON Intervention for informal carers. Methods: This study involved a two-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial. Carers were randomly assigned to receiving versus not receiving the NEON Intervention. The feasibility aspects investigated included the acceptability of the intervention and of randomization, trial processes, engagement rates, recruitment procedures, attrition, sample size estimation, identification of candidate primary and secondary outcomes, and the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial. A qualitative process evaluation was conducted. Findings: A total of 121 carers were eligible, of whom 54 were randomized (intervention: 27, control: 27). Twelve-month follow-up data were available for 36 carers. Carers accessed a mean of 25 narratives over a 12-month period, and the intervention group, compared with the control group, reported a small effect on hope and a moderate effect on the presence of meaning in life. Five modifications were recommended to improve the user experience, applicability, and trial processes. Discussion: The NEON Intervention is feasible and acceptable. Significant refinement of the NEON Intervention and trial processes is required to personalize and ensure applicability to carers. Further feasibility testing is recommended prior to a definitive trial.
Citation
Ng, F., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Onwumere, J., Newby, C., Llewellyn-Beardsley, J., Yeo, C., Ali, Y., Pollock, K., Kotera, Y., Pomberth, S., Gavan, S. P., van der Krieke, L., Robotham, D., Gillard, S., Thornicroft, G., & Slade, M. (2024). Pragmatic, feasibility randomized controlled trial of a recorded mental health recovery narrative intervention: narrative experiences online intervention for informal carers (NEON-C). Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, Article 1272396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1272396
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 14, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 23, 2024 |
Publication Date | Jan 23, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Dec 15, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 15, 2023 |
Journal | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
Electronic ISSN | 1664-0640 |
Publisher | Frontiers Media |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 14 |
Article Number | 1272396 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1272396 |
Keywords | Mental health, recovery, recovery narratives, carers, NEON Intervention, recommender system, digital health intervention, online intervention |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/28433001 |
Publisher URL | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1272396/full |
Files
fpsyt-14-1272396
(670 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2023 Ng, Rennick-Egglestone, Onwumere, Newby, Llewellyn-Beardsley, Yeo, Ali, Pollock, Kotera, Pomberth, Gavan, Van Der Krieke, Robotham, Gillard, Thornicroft and Slade. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search