Andreas Herrmann
Moderating Loss Aversion: Loss Aversion Has Moderators, But Reports of its Death are Greatly Exaggerated
Authors
Kellen Mrkva
SIMON GAECHTER simon.gaechter@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor, Psychology of Economic Decision Making
Eric J. Johnson
Abstract
Loss aversion, the principle that losses impact decision making more than equivalent gains, is a fundamental idea in consumer behavior and decision making, though its existence has recently been called into question. Across five unique samples (Ntotal = 17,720), we tested predictions about what moderates loss aversion, which were derived from a preference construction account. Across studies, more domain knowledge and experience were associated with lower loss aversion, though people of all knowledge and experience levels were loss averse. Among car buyers, those who knew more about a particular car attribute (e.g., fuel economy) were less loss averse for that attribute but not other attributes (e.g., comfort), consistent with the idea that people with less attribute knowledge are more likely to construct preferences, thereby increasing loss aversion. Additionally, older consumers were more loss averse across different loss aversion measures and studies. We discuss implications for several accounts of loss aversion, including accounts rooted in status quo bias, emotion, or ownership. In addition to discovering loss aversion moderators, we cast doubt on recent claims that loss aversion is a fallacy or is fully explained by status quo bias, risk aversion, or the educated laboratory samples often used to study loss aversion.
Citation
Herrmann, A., Mrkva, K., Gächter, S., & Johnson, E. J. (2020). Moderating Loss Aversion: Loss Aversion Has Moderators, But Reports of its Death are Greatly Exaggerated. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1156
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 12, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 19, 2019 |
Publication Date | 2020-07 |
Deposit Date | Jan 7, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 20, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Consumer Psychology |
Print ISSN | 1057-7408 |
Electronic ISSN | 1532-7663 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 30 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 407-428 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1156 |
Keywords | Applied Psychology; Marketing |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3681587 |
Publisher URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcpy.1156 |
Additional Information | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Mrkva, K., Johnson, E.J., Gächter, S. and Herrmann, A. (2019), Moderating Loss Aversion: Loss Aversion Has Moderators, But Reports of its Death are Greatly Exaggerated. J Consum Psychol. Accepted Author Manuscript, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1156. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. |
Files
Mrkva-Johnson-Gaechter-Herrmann_2019-11-20
(1.2 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
Leaders as role models and ‘belief managers’ in social dilemmas
(2018)
Journal Article
Dispositional free riders do not free ride on punishment
(2018)
Journal Article
Human pro-social motivation and the maintenance of social order
(2014)
Book Chapter
People prefer coordinated punishment in cooperative interactions
(2019)
Journal Article
Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices
(2021)
Journal Article