GULSHAN KHAN GULSHAN.KHAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor
Against received opinion: Recovering the original meaning of ‘paradox’ for populism and liberal democracy
Khan, Gulshan
Authors
Abstract
In philosophy and political theory, the term paradox is often used synonymously with antinomy, contradiction and aporia. This article clarifies the meaning of these terms through tracing their respective etymology. We see that antinomy denotes a deep-seated conceptual opposition, whereas contradiction and aporia represent alternative responses to antinomy. The former presents the antinomy as potentially resolvable at some future time, and the latter sees the antinomy instead as a constitutive impasse. By way of contrast, para doxa originally referred to a statement that is ‘contrary to received opinion’, but this idea has generally been subsumed – both in philosophy and more common place understandings – under the notion of aporia. This conceptual recovery enables a better understanding of key traditions in social and political theory, notably post-structuralism and Habermasian critical theory, which can be demarcated through their respective responses to the emergence of ‘paradoxes’. However, the article also demonstrates the material significance of these philosophical categories through their application to contemporary democratic politics. I analyse the constitutive tension between liberalism and democracy as well as the emergence of populism and show how these conceptual tools provide new insights for understanding these most pressing political developments of our time.
Citation
Khan, G. (2023). Against received opinion: Recovering the original meaning of ‘paradox’ for populism and liberal democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism, https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537231219944
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 9, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 26, 2023 |
Publication Date | Dec 26, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Nov 13, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 26, 2023 |
Journal | Philosophy and Social Criticism |
Print ISSN | 0191-4537 |
Electronic ISSN | 1461-734X |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537231219944 |
Keywords | Antinomy, aporia, liberal democracy performative contradiction, paradox, populism |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/27366721 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/01914537231219944 |
Files
Against Received Opinion
(604 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Beyond the ontological turn: affirming the relative autonomy of politics
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search