Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Inverse association between blood pressure and pulse oximetry accuracy: an observational study in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection

Crooks, Colin J; West, Joe; Morling, Jo; Simmonds, Mark; Juurlink, Irene; Briggs, Steve; Cruickshank, Simon; Hammond-Pears, Susan; Shaw, Dominick; Card, Tim; Fogarty, Andrew W

Inverse association between blood pressure and pulse oximetry accuracy: an observational study in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection Thumbnail


Authors

JOE WEST JOE.WEST@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Epidemiology

Jo Morling

Mark Simmonds

Irene Juurlink

Steve Briggs

Simon Cruickshank

Susan Hammond-Pears

Dr TIM CARD tim.card@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Associate Professor

ANDREW FOGARTY ANDREW.FOGARTY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Clinical Associate Professor & Reader in Clinical Epidemiology



Abstract

Background
Pulse oximeters are a standard non-invasive tool to measure blood oxygen levels, and are used in multiple healthcare settings. It is important to understand the factors affecting their accuracy to be able to use them optimally and safely. This analysis aimed to explore the association of the measurement error of pulse oximeters with systolic BP, diastolic BP and heart rate (HR) within ranges of values commonly observed in clinical practice.

Methods
The study design was a retrospective observational study of all patients admitted to a large teaching hospital with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection from February 2020 to December 2021. Data on systolic and diastolic BPs and HR levels were available from the same time period as the pulse oximetry measurements.

Results
Data were available for 3420 patients with 5927 observations of blood oxygen saturations as measured by pulse oximetry and ABG sampling within 30 min. The difference in oxygen saturation using the paired pulse oximetry and arterial oxygen saturation difference measurements was inversely associated with systolic BP, increasing by 0.02% with each mm Hg decrease in systolic BP (95% CI 0.00% to 0.03%) over a range of 80–180 mm Hg. Inverse associations were also observed between the error for oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry and with both diastolic BP (+0.03%; 95% CI 0.00% to 0.05%) and HR (+0.04%; 95% CI 0.02% to 0.06% for each unit decrease in the HR).

Conclusions
Care needs to be taken in interpreting pulse oximetry measurements in patients with lower systolic and diastolic BPs, and HRs, as oxygen saturation is overestimated as BP and HR decrease. Confirmation of the oxygen saturation with an ABG may be appropriate in some clinical scenarios.

Citation

Crooks, C. J., West, J., Morling, J., Simmonds, M., Juurlink, I., Briggs, S., …Fogarty, A. W. (2023). Inverse association between blood pressure and pulse oximetry accuracy: an observational study in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Emergency Medicine Journal, 40(3), 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212443

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 1, 2022
Online Publication Date Dec 7, 2022
Publication Date Mar 1, 2023
Deposit Date Dec 9, 2022
Publicly Available Date Jan 9, 2023
Journal Emergency Medicine Journal
Print ISSN 1472-0205
Electronic ISSN 1472-0213
Publisher BMJ
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 40
Issue 3
Pages 216-220
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212443
Keywords Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine; General Medicine; Emergency Medicine
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/14601875
Publisher URL https://emj.bmj.com/content/early/2022/12/06/emermed-2022-212443

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations