Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Being more certain about random assignment in social policy evaluations

Stafford, B.

Authors

B. Stafford Bruce.Stafford@nottingham.ac.uk



Abstract

Social experiments have been widely utilised in evaluations of social programmes in the US to identify ‘what works’, whilst in the UK their use is more controversial. This paper explores the paradigmatic, technical and practical issues evaluators confront in using randomised experiments to evaluate social policies. Possible remedies to some of these problems are outlined. It is argued that although no evaluation methodology is problem-free, policy makers and researchers should be more confident about the merits of using random assignment, provided it is used in conjunction with other methodologies more suited to understanding why and how interventions work.

Citation

Stafford, B. (2002). Being more certain about random assignment in social policy evaluations. Social Policy and Society, 1(4),

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2002
Deposit Date Jan 14, 2008
Publicly Available Date Jan 14, 2008
Journal Social Policy and Society
Print ISSN 1474-7464
Electronic ISSN 1474-7464
Publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 1
Issue 4
Keywords random assignment,social policy, evaluations
Public URL http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/732
Publisher URL http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=SPS&volumeId=1&issueId=04
Copyright Statement Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf

Files


random_assignment.pdf (87 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf





You might also like



Downloadable Citations