Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Work-related stress case definitions and prevalence rates in national surveys

Houdmont, Jonathan; Cox, Tom; Griffiths, Amanda

Authors

AMANDA GRIFFITHS amanda.griffiths@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Occupational Health Psychology



Abstract

Background: There is concern about lack of consistency in the design of case definitions used to measure work-related stress in national workforce surveys and the implications of this for the reliability and validity of prevalence estimates as well as for developments in policy and practice on tackling work-related stress.
Aims: To examine associations between case definitions used for the measurement of work-related stress in nationally representative workforce surveys and the prevalence rates generated.
Methods: The study focused on 18 nationally representative workforce surveys conducted between 1995 and 2008 that involved British samples. The published report from each survey was scrutinized for evidence of the case definition used to measure work-related stress and the associated prevalence rate.
Results: Several types of case definition were identified that differed in terms of their theoretical basis, structure, and content. Each was associated with a unique range of prevalence rates.
Conclusions: The results illustrate the challenge presented to the production of valid and reliable estimates of the scale of work-related stress by inconsistent case definition design. The imperative for theory-based consistency in the design of case definitions used for the measurement of work-related stress in national workforce surveys is highlighted.

Citation

Houdmont, J., Cox, T., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Work-related stress case definitions and prevalence rates in national surveys. Occupational Medicine, 60(8), doi:10.1093/occmed/kqq138

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Dec 1, 2010
Deposit Date Jan 11, 2011
Publicly Available Date Jan 11, 2011
Journal Occupational Medicine
Print ISSN 0962-7480
Electronic ISSN 0962-7480
Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 60
Issue 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq138
Public URL http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/1412
Publisher URL http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/8/658
Copyright Statement Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf
Additional Information This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Occupational Medicine following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version: J. Houdmont, T. Cox and A. Griffiths, Work-related stress case definitions and prevalence rates in national surveys, Occupational Medicine, 2010, 60(8), 658-661, is available online at: http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/8/658

Files


Houdmont_et_al_for_eprint_repository.pdf (45 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf





You might also like



Downloadable Citations