Mike J. Crawford
The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of lamotrigine for people with borderline personality disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Crawford, Mike J.; Sanatinia, Rahil; Barrett, Barbara; Cunningham, Gillian; Dale, Oliver; Ganguli, Poushali; Lawrence-Smith, Geoff; Leeson, Verity; Lemonsky, Fenella; Lykomitrou, Georgia; Montgomery, Alan A.; Morriss, Richard K.; Munjiza, Jasna; Paton, Carol; Skorodzien, Iwona; Singh, Vineet; Tan, Wei; Tyrer, Peter; Reilly, Joseph G.
Authors
Rahil Sanatinia
Barbara Barrett
Gillian Cunningham
Oliver Dale
Poushali Ganguli
Geoff Lawrence-Smith
Verity Leeson
Fenella Lemonsky
Georgia Lykomitrou
Professor ALAN MONTGOMERY ALAN.MONTGOMERY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
DIRECTOR NOTTINGHAM CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT
Professor RICHARD MORRISS richard.morriss@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF PSYCHIATRY AND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH
Jasna Munjiza
Carol Paton
Iwona Skorodzien
Vineet Singh
Wei Tan
Peter Tyrer
Joseph G. Reilly
Abstract
Objectives: To examine whether lamotrigine is a clinically effective and cost-effective treatment for people with borderline personality disorder.
Method: Multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Between July 2013 to November 2016, we recruited 276 people aged 18 or over, who met diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder. We excluded those with co-existing bipolar affective disorder or psychosis, those already taking a mood stabiliser, and women at risk of pregnancy. We randomly allocated participants on a 1:1 ratio to up to 400mg of lamotrigine per day or an inert placebo using a remote web-based randomization service. The primary outcome was total score on the Zanarini Rating scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD) at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms, deliberate self-harm, social functioning, health-related quality of life, resource use and costs, side effects of treatment and adverse events.
Results: 195 (70.6%) participants were followed up at 52 weeks, at which point 49 (36%) of those prescribed lamotrigine and 58 (42%) of those prescribed placebo were taking it. Mean total ZAN-BPD score was 11.3 (SD = 6.6) among those randomized to lamotrigine and 11.5 (SD = 7.7) among those randomized to placebo (adjusted difference in means = 0.1, 95% C.I = -1.8 to 2.0, p=0.91). There was no evidence of any differences in secondary outcomes. Costs of direct care for those prescribed lamotrigine were similar to those prescribed placebo.
Conclusions: Treating people with borderline personality disorder with lamotrigine is not a clinically effective or cost-effective use of resources.
Citation
Crawford, M. J., Sanatinia, R., Barrett, B., Cunningham, G., Dale, O., Ganguli, P., Lawrence-Smith, G., Leeson, V., Lemonsky, F., Lykomitrou, G., Montgomery, A. A., Morriss, R. K., Munjiza, J., Paton, C., Skorodzien, I., Singh, V., Tan, W., Tyrer, P., & Reilly, J. G. (2018). The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of lamotrigine for people with borderline personality disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(8), 756-764. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17091006
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 20, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 6, 2018 |
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Jan 4, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 7, 2019 |
Journal | American Journal of Psychiatry |
Print ISSN | 0002-953X |
Electronic ISSN | 1535-7228 |
Publisher | Psychiatry Online |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 175 |
Issue | 8 |
Pages | 756-764 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17091006 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/923999 |
Publisher URL | https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17091006 |
Additional Information | The official published article is available online at https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17091006 |
Contract Date | Jan 4, 2018 |
Files
AmJPsych5.pdf
(614 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search