SAMANTHA HARRISON SAMANTHA.HARRISON1@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Clinical Trial Manager
Needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren’s contractures of the fingers (Hand-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Harrison, Samantha; Ogollah, Reuben; Hollingworth, William; Mills, Nicola; Karantana, Alexia; Blazeby, Jane; Montgomery, Alan; Shafayat, Aisha; Jarrett, Hugh; Davis, Tim
Authors
REUBEN OGOLLAH REUBEN.OGOLLAH@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor of Medical Statistics and Clinical Trials
William Hollingworth
Nicola Mills
ALEXIA KARANTANA ALEXIA.KARANTANA@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Clinical Associate Professor in Hand Surgery
Jane Blazeby
ALAN MONTGOMERY ALAN.MONTGOMERY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Director Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit
AISHA SHAFAYAT Aisha.Shafayat@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Trial Manager
HUGH JARRETT Hugh.Jarrett@nottingham.ac.uk
Senior Trial Manager
Tim Davis
Abstract
Background: Dupuytren’s contractures (DC) are fibrous cords under the skin of the hand that cause one or more fingers to curl gradually and irreversibly towards the palm. These contractures are usually painless but can cause a loss of hand function. Two treatments for Dupuytren’s contractures are widely used within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK: removal of the contractures via surgery (limited fasciectomy) and division of the contractures via a needle inserted through the skin (needle fasciotomy). This study aims to establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of needle fasciotomy (NF) versus limited fasciectomy (LF) for the treatment of DC in the NHS, in terms of patient-reported hand function and resource utilisation. Methods/design: Hand-2 is a national multi-centre, two-arm, parallel-group randomised, non-inferiority trial. Patients will be eligible to join the trial if they are aged 18 years or older, have at least one previously untreated finger with a well-defined Dupuytren’s contracture of 30° or greater that causes functional problems and is suitable for treatment with either LF or NF. Patients with a contracture of the distal interphalangeal joint only are ineligible. Eligible consenting patients will be randomised 1:1 to receive either NF or LF and will be followed up for 24 months post-treatment. A QuinteT Recruitment Intervention will be used to optimise recruitment. The primary outcome measure is the participant-reported assessment of hand function, assessed by the Hand Health Profile of the Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM) questionnaire at 12 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include other patient-reported measures, loss of finger movement, and cost-effectiveness, reported over the 24-month post-treatment. Embedded qualitative research will explore patient experiences and acceptability of treatment at 2 years post-surgery. Discussion: This study will determine whether treatment with needle fasciotomy is non-inferior to limited fasciectomy in terms of patient-reported hand function at 12 months post-treatment. Trial registration: International Standard Registered Clinical/soCial sTudy ISRCTN12525655. Registered on 18th September 2020.
Citation
Harrison, S., Ogollah, R., Hollingworth, W., Mills, N., Karantana, A., Blazeby, J., …Davis, T. (2024). Needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren’s contractures of the fingers (Hand-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 25(1), Article 398. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08003-1
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 21, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 19, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024 |
Deposit Date | Jun 20, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 20, 2024 |
Journal | Trials |
Electronic ISSN | 1745-6215 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 25 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 398 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08003-1 |
Keywords | Needle fasciotomy, Randomised control trial, Patient acceptability, Hand surgery, Limited fasciectomy, Dupuytren’s contractures |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/36300494 |
Publisher URL | https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-024-08003-1 |
Files
s13063-024-08003-1
(1.9 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search