Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Baseline morphine consumption may explain between-study heterogeneity in meta-analyses of adjuvant analgesics and improve precision and accuracy of effect estimates

Doleman, Brett; Sutton, Alex J.; Sherwin, Matthew; Lund, Jonathan N.; Williams, John P.

Baseline morphine consumption may explain between-study heterogeneity in meta-analyses of adjuvant analgesics and improve precision and accuracy of effect estimates Thumbnail


Authors

Brett Doleman

Alex J. Sutton

Matthew Sherwin

JONATHAN LUND JON.LUND@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Clinical Associate Professor

JOHN WILLIAMS john.williams7@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Associate Professor



Abstract

BACKGROUND: Statistical heterogeneity can increase the uncertainty of results and reduce the quality of evidence derived from systematic reviews. At present, it is uncertain what the major factors are that account for heterogeneity in meta-analyses of analgesic adjuncts. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify whether various covariates could explain statistical heterogeneity and use this to improve accuracy when reporting the efficacy of analgesics.

METHODS: We searched for reviews using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. First, we identified the existence of considerable statistical heterogeneity (I 2 > 75%). Second, we conducted meta-regression analysis for the outcome of 24-hour morphine consumption using baseline risk (control group morphine consumption) and other clinical and methodological covariates. Finally, we constructed a league table of adjuvant analgesics using a novel method of reporting effect estimates assuming a fixed consumption of 50 mg postoperative morphine.

RESULTS: We included 344 randomized controlled trials with 28,130 participants. Ninety-one percent of analyses showed considerable statistical heterogeneity. Baseline risk was a significant cause of between-study heterogeneity for acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, tramadol, ketamine, α2-agonists, gabapentin, pregabalin, lidocaine, magnesium, and dexamethasone (R 2 = 21%–100%; P < .05). There was some evidence that the methodological limitations of the trials explained some of the residual heterogeneity. Type of surgery was not independently associated with analgesic efficacy. Assuming a fixed baseline risk of 50 mg (in order of efficacy), gabapentin, acetaminophen, α2-agonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, pregabalin, tramadol, magnesium, and lidocaine demonstrated moderate clinically significant reductions (>10 mg). We could not exclude a moderate clinically significant effect with ketamine. Dexamethasone demonstrated a small clinical benefit (>5 mg).

CONCLUSIONS: We empirically identified baseline morphine consumption as the major source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of adjuvant analgesics across all surgical interventions. Controlling for baseline morphine consumption, clinicians can use audit data to estimate the morphine-reducing effect of adding any adjuvant for their local population, regardless which surgery they undergo. Moreover, we have utilized these findings to present a novel method of reporting and an amended method of graphically displaying effect estimates, which both reduces confounding from variable baseline risk in included trials and is able to adjust for other clinical and methodological confounding variables. We recommend use of these methods in clinical practice and future reviews of analgesics for postoperative pain.

Citation

Doleman, B., Sutton, A. J., Sherwin, M., Lund, J. N., & Williams, J. P. (2018). Baseline morphine consumption may explain between-study heterogeneity in meta-analyses of adjuvant analgesics and improve precision and accuracy of effect estimates. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(2), 648-660. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002237

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 25, 2017
Online Publication Date Jul 4, 2017
Publication Date Feb 1, 2018
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2017
Publicly Available Date Jul 5, 2018
Journal Anesthesia & Analgesia
Print ISSN 0003-2999
Electronic ISSN 1526-7598
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 126
Issue 2
Pages 648-660
DOI https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002237
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/917085
Publisher URL https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Citation/2018/02000/Baseline_Morphine_Consumption_May_Explain.45.aspx
Additional Information This is not the final published version of this article.
Contract Date Nov 13, 2017