Tom Freeman
Auditory compensation for head rotation is incomplete
Freeman, Tom; Culling, John; Akeroyd, Michael A.; Brimijoin, W. Owen
Authors
John Culling
Professor Michael Akeroyd MICHAEL.AKEROYD@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF HEARING SCIENCES
W. Owen Brimijoin
Abstract
Hearing is confronted by a similar problem to vision when the observer moves. The image motion that is created remains ambiguous until the observer knows the velocity of eye and/or head. One way the visual system solves this problem is to use motor commands, proprioception and vestibular information. These ‘extra-retinal signals’ compensate for self movement, converting image motion into head-centred coordinates, though not always perfectly. We investigated whether the auditory system also transforms coordinates by examining the degree of compensation for head rotation when judging a moving sound. Real-time recordings of head motion were used to change the ‘movement gain’ relating head movement to source movement across a loudspeaker array. We then determined psychophysically the gain that corresponded to a perceptually-stationary source. Experiment 1 showed that the gain was small and positive for a wide range of trained head speeds. Hence listeners perceived a stationary source as moving slightly opposite to the head rotation, in much the same way that observers see stationary visual objects move against a smooth pursuit eye movement. Experiment 2 showed the degree of compensation remained the same for sounds presented at different azimuths, although the precision of performance declined when the sound was eccentric. We discuss two possible explanations for incomplete compensation, one based on differences in the accuracy of signals encoding image motion and self-movement, and one concerning statistical optimisation that sacrifices accuracy for precision. We then consider the degree to which such explanations can be applied to auditory motion perception in moving listeners.
Citation
Freeman, T., Culling, J., Akeroyd, M. A., & Brimijoin, W. O. (in press). Auditory compensation for head rotation is incomplete. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(2), https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000321
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 1, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 14, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Nov 14, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 14, 2016 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance |
Print ISSN | 0096-1523 |
Electronic ISSN | 1939-1277 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 43 |
Issue | 2 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000321 |
Keywords | hearing, motion perception, head rotation |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/828682 |
Publisher URL | http://psycnet.apa.org/psycarticles/2016-55068-001 |
Contract Date | Nov 14, 2016 |
Files
371.pdf
(733 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
You might also like
What Happens When We Hear?
(2023)
Journal Article
The impact of tinnitus on adult cochlear implant recipients: A mixed-method approach
(2023)
Journal Article
Inferring the basis of binaural detection with a modified autoencoder
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search