Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation

Lacinska, Alicja M.; Styles, Michael T.; Bateman, Keith; Wagner, Doris; Hall, Matthew R.; Gowing, Charles; Brown, Paul D.

Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation Thumbnail


Authors

Alicja M. Lacinska

Michael T. Styles

Keith Bateman

Doris Wagner

Matthew R. Hall

Charles Gowing

Paul D. Brown



Abstract

Serpentine minerals serve as a Mg donor in carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM). The acid-treatment of nine comprehensively-examined serpentine polymorphs and polytypes, and the subsequent microanalysis of their post-test residues highlighted several aspects of great importance to the choice of the optimal feed material for CCSM. Compelling evidence for the non-uniformity of serpentine mineral performance was revealed, and the following order of increasing Mg extraction efficiency after three hours of acid-leaching was established: Al-bearing polygonal serpentine (<5%) ≤ Al-bearing lizardite 1T (≈5%) < antigorite (24-29%) < well-ordered lizardite 2H1 (≈65%) ≤ Al-poor lizardite 1T (≈68%) < chrysotile (≈70%) < poorly-ordered lizardite 2H1 (≈80%) < nanotubular chrysotile (≈85%).
It was recognised that the Mg extraction efficiency of the minerals depended greatly on the intrinsic properties of crystal structure, chemistry and rock microtexture. On this basis, antigorite and Al-bearing well-ordered lizardite were rejected as potential feedstock material whereas any chrysotile, non-aluminous, widely spaced lizardite and/or disordered serpentine were recommended.
The formation of peripheral siliceous layers, tens of microns thick, was not universal and depended greatly upon the intrinsic microtexture of the leached particles. This study provides the first comprehensive investigation of nine, carefully-selected serpentine minerals, covering most varieties and polytypes, under the same experimental conditions. We focused on material characterisation and the identification of the intrinsic properties of the minerals that affect particle’s reactivity. It can therefore serve as a generic basis for any acid-based CCSM pre-treatment.

Citation

Lacinska, A. M., Styles, M. T., Bateman, K., Wagner, D., Hall, M. R., Gowing, C., & Brown, P. D. (2016). Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation. Chemical Geology, 437, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.015

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 18, 2016
Online Publication Date May 20, 2016
Publication Date Oct 25, 2016
Deposit Date Jul 4, 2016
Publicly Available Date Jul 4, 2016
Journal Chemical Geology
Print ISSN 0009-2541
Electronic ISSN 0009-2541
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 437
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.015
Keywords Serpentine minerals; Mineral dissolution; CO2 sequestration
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/821797
Publisher URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254116302546
Contract Date Jul 4, 2016

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations