Dr CHARLOTTE HALL CHARLOTTE.HALL@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PRINCIPAL RESEARCH FELLOW
The challenges of implementing ADHD clinical guidelines and research best evidence in routine clinical care settings: a Delphi survey and mixed-methods study
Hall, Charlotte L.; Taylor, John A.; Newell, Karen; Baldwin, Laurence; Sayal, Kapil; Hollis, Chris
Authors
John A. Taylor
Karen Newell
Laurence Baldwin
Professor KAPIL SAYAL kapil.sayal@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
Professor CHRIS HOLLIS chris.hollis@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY AND DIGITAL MENTAL HEALTH
Abstract
Background:The landmark US Multimodal Treatment of ADHD (MTA) study established the benefits of individualised medication titration and optimisation strategies to improve short- to medium-term outcomes in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This individualised medication management approach was subsequently incorporated into the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ADHD Clinical Guidelines (NICE CG78). However, little is known about clinicians’ attitudes towards implementing these medication management strategies for ADHD in routine care.
Aims: To examine National Health Service (NHS) healthcare professionals’ consensus on ADHD medication management strategies.
Method :Using the Delphi method, we examined perceptions on the importance and feasibility of implementing 103 ADHD treatment statements from sources including the UK NICE ADHD guidelines and US medication management algorithms.
Results: Certain recommendations for ADHD medication management were judged as important and feasible to implement, including a stepwise titration of stimulant medication. Other recommendations were perceived as important but not feasible to implement in routine practice, such as weekly clinic follow-up with the family during titration and collection of follow-up symptom questionnaires.
Conclusions :Many of the key guideline recommendations for ADHD medication management are viewed by clinicians as important and feasible to implement. However, some recommendations present significant implementation challenges within the context of routine NHS clinical care in England.
Citation
Hall, C. L., Taylor, J. A., Newell, K., Baldwin, L., Sayal, K., & Hollis, C. (2016). The challenges of implementing ADHD clinical guidelines and research best evidence in routine clinical care settings: a Delphi survey and mixed-methods study. BJPsych Open, 2(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002386
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 13, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 2, 2018 |
Publication Date | Jan 20, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jan 28, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 28, 2016 |
Journal | BJPsych open |
Electronic ISSN | 2056-4724 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 2 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 25-31 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002386 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/772068 |
Publisher URL | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-open/article/challenges-of-implementing-adhd-clinical-guidelines-and-research-best-evidence-in-routine-clinical-care-settings-delphi-survey-and-mixedmethods-study/9A267EF92D7B8B4AD65CD41E3D8EC92B |
Contract Date | Jan 28, 2016 |
Files
Published_2016_BJPOpen_Delphi.pdf
(180 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search