Huseyin Avsar
Target size guidelines for interactive displays on the flight deck
Avsar, Huseyin; Fischer, Joel E.; Rodden, Tom
Authors
Professor JOEL FISCHER Joel.Fischer@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION
Professor TOM RODDEN TOM.RODDEN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Pro-Vice-Chancellor of Research & Knowledge Exchange
Abstract
The avionics industry is seeking to understand the challenges and benefits of touchscreens on flight decks. This paper presents an investigation of interactive displays on the flight deck focusing on the impact of target size, placement and vibration on performance. A study was undertaken with search and rescue (SAR) crew members in an operational setting in helicopters. Results are essential to understand how to design effective touchscreen interfaces for the flight deck. Results show that device placement, vibration and target size have significant effects on targeting accuracy. However, increasing target size eliminates the negative effects of placement and vibration in most cases. The findings suggest that 15 mm targets are sufficiently large for non-safety critical Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) applications. For interaction with fixed displays where pilots have to extend their arms, and for safety critical tasks it is recommended to use interactive elements of about 20 mm size.
Citation
Avsar, H., Fischer, J. E., & Rodden, T. Target size guidelines for interactive displays on the flight deck. Presented at 2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)
Conference Name | 2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) |
---|---|
End Date | Sep 17, 2015 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jan 29, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 29, 2016 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Article Number | 3C4-1-3C4-15 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/757840 |
Publisher URL | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7311400 |
Additional Information | © 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. Published in: 2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), IEEE, 2015, ISBN 9781479989393. doi: 10.1109/DASC.2015.7311400 |
Files
Avsar_DASC2015.pdf
(1.8 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
You might also like
Discomfort—the dark side of fun
(2018)
Book Chapter
Learning from the Veg Box: Designing Unpredictability in Agency Delegation
(2018)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
A Method for Evaluating Options for Motif Detection in Electricity Meter Data
(2018)
Journal Article
Bread stories: understanding the drivers of bread consumption for digital food customisation
(2017)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Data Work: How Energy Advisors and Clients Make IoT Data Accountable
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search