Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?

Docherty, Graeme; Lewis, Sarah; McEwen, Andy; Bauld, Linda; Coleman, Tim

doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107

Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?

Docherty, Graeme; Lewis, Sarah; McEwen, Andy; Bauld, Linda; Coleman, Tim

Authors

Graeme Docherty

Professor SARAH LEWIS SARAH.LEWIS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF MEDICAL STATISTICS

Andy McEwen

Linda Bauld

Professor TIM COLEMAN tim.coleman@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF PRIMARY CARE

Citation

Docherty, G., Lewis, S., McEwen, A., Bauld, L., & Coleman, T. (2014). Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?. Tobacco Control, 23(6), 524-525. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107

Journal Article Type	Letter
Acceptance Date	Jun 2, 2013
Online Publication Date	Jul 23, 2013
Publication Date	2014-11
Deposit Date	Feb 2, 2016
Publicly Available Date	Feb 2, 2016
Journal	Tobacco Control
Print ISSN	0964-4563
Electronic ISSN	1468-3318
Publisher	BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed	Peer Reviewed
Volume	23
Issue	6
Pages	524-525
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107
Public URL	https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/737245
Publisher URL	http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/23/6/524