Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Rating crowdsourced annotations: evaluating contributions of variable quality and completeness

Foody, Giles M.

Rating crowdsourced annotations: evaluating contributions of variable quality and completeness Thumbnail


Authors

GILES FOODY giles.foody@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Geographical Information



Abstract

Crowdsourcing has become a popular means to acquire data about the Earth and its environment inexpensively, but the data-sets obtained are typically imperfect and of unknown quality. Two common imperfections with crowdsourced data are the contributions from cheats or spammers and missing cases. The effect of the latter two imperfections on a method to evaluate the accuracy of crowdsourced data via a latent class model was explored. Using simulated and real data-sets, it was shown that the method is able to derive useful information on the accuracy of crowdsourced data even when the degree of imperfection was very high. The practical potential of this ability to obtain accuracy information within the geospatial sciences and the realm of Digital Earth applications was indicated with reference to an evaluation of building damage maps produced by multiple bodies after the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. Critically, the method allowed data-sets to be ranked in approximately the correct order of accuracy and this could help ensure that the most appropriate data-sets are used. © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.

Citation

Foody, G. M. (2014). Rating crowdsourced annotations: evaluating contributions of variable quality and completeness. International Journal of Digital Earth, 7(8), 650-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2013.839008

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 23, 2013
Online Publication Date Nov 15, 2013
Publication Date Sep 14, 2014
Deposit Date Apr 22, 2014
Publicly Available Date Apr 22, 2014
Journal International Journal of Digital Earth
Print ISSN 1753-8947
Electronic ISSN 1753-8955
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 7
Issue 8
Pages 650-670
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2013.839008
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/719379
Publisher URL http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCopyRight?doi=10.1080%2F17538947.2013.839008#tabModule
Additional Information This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

Permission is granted subject to the terms of the License under which the work was published. Please check the License conditions for the work which you wish to reuse. Full and appropriate attribution must be given. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations