Magdalena Opazo Breton
Was the implementation of standardised tobacco packaging legislation in England associated with changes in smoking prevalence? A segmented regression analysis between 2006 and 2019
Opazo Breton, Magdalena; Britton, John; Brown, Jamie; Beard, Emma; Bogdanovica, Ilze
Authors
John Britton
Jamie Brown
Emma Beard
Dr ILZE BOGDANOVICA ILZE.BOGDANOVICA@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor
Abstract
Background and aim In 2016, England initiated the implementation of standardised tobacco packaging, introduced in conjunction with minimum pack sizes and other measures included in the 2014 European Tobacco Products Directive, over the course of a 1-year sell-off period ending in May 2017. These measures have been shown to have been associated with increases in tobacco prices and product diversity. We now investigate the association between implementation of the new legislation and smoking status in England.
Design Segmented regression analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys using a generalised linear model with individual-level data to test for a change in trend and immediate step change.
Setting England.
Participants Participants in the Smoking Toolkit Study, which involves repeated, cross‐sectional household surveys of individuals aged 16 years and older in England. The sample included 278 219 individual observations collected between November 2006 and December 2019.
Intervention Implementation of standardised packaging legislation (May 2016 and May 2017).
Measurements Individual-level current smoking status adjusted for implementation of tobacco control policies, cigarette price, seasonality and autocorrelation.
Findings The implementation of standardised packaging was associated with a significant step reduction in the odds of being a smoker after May 2017 (OR: 0.93; 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99). The magnitude of the association was similar when modelling the step change in May 2016 at the start of the 1-year policy implementation period (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.97).
Conclusions This is the first independent study demonstrating that implementation of standardised packaging was associated with a reduction in smoking in England which occurred in anticipation of, rather than after, full policy implementation. It appears that the odds of being a smoker were affected by the prospect of the move to standardised packs and accompanying legislation.
Citation
Opazo Breton, M., Britton, J., Brown, J., Beard, E., & Bogdanovica, I. (2021). Was the implementation of standardised tobacco packaging legislation in England associated with changes in smoking prevalence? A segmented regression analysis between 2006 and 2019. Tobacco Control, https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056694
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 22, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 29, 2021 |
Publication Date | Jul 29, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Jul 13, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 3, 2021 |
Journal | Tobacco Control |
Print ISSN | 0964-4563 |
Electronic ISSN | 1468-3318 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056694 |
Keywords | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Health(social science) |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5782052 |
Publisher URL | https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2021/07/29/tobaccocontrol-2021-056694 |
Files
UoN Archive Version Tob Control
(987 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Electronic cigarettes, smoking and population health
(2014)
Journal Article
Smoking in cars in England: a study of school students in an English city
(2014)
Journal Article
What is the quality of smoking cessation advice in guidelines of tobacco-related diseases?
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search