Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Predicting the risk of prostate cancer in asymptomatic men: a cohort study to develop and validate a novel algorithm

Coupland, Carol; Hippisley-Cox, Julia

Predicting the risk of prostate cancer in asymptomatic men: a cohort study to develop and validate a novel algorithm Thumbnail


Authors

CAROL COUPLAND carol.coupland@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Medical Statistics

Julia Hippisley-Cox



Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of prostate cancer at an early stage can potentially identify tumours when intervention may improve treatment options and survival.

Aim: To develop and validate an equation to predict absolute risk of prostate cancer in asymptomatic men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests in primary care.

Design and setting: Cohort study using data from English general practices, held in the QResearch database.

Method: Routine data were collected from 1098 QResearch English general practices linked to mortality, hospital, and cancer records for model development. Two separate sets of practices were used for validation. In total, there were 844 455 men aged 25–84 years with PSA tests recorded who were free of prostate cancer at baseline in the derivation cohort; the validation cohorts comprised 292 084 and 316 583 men. The primary outcome was incident prostate cancer. Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive 10-year risk equations. Measures of performance were determined in both validation cohorts.

Results: There were 40 821 incident cases of prostate cancer in the derivation cohort. The risk equation included PSA level, age, deprivation, ethnicity, smoking status, serious mental illness, diabetes, BMI, and family history of prostate cancer. The risk equation explained 70.4% (95% CI = 69.2 to 71.6) of the variation in time to diagnosis of prostate cancer (R2) (D statistic 3.15, 95% CI = 3.06 to 3.25; Harrell’s C-index 0.917, 95% CI = 0.915 to 0.919). Two-step approach had higher sensitivity than a fixed PSA threshold at identifying prostate cancer cases (identifying 68.2% versus 43.9% of cases), high-grade cancers (49.2% versus 40.3%), and deaths (67.0% versus 31.5%).

Conclusion: The risk equation provided valid measures of absolute risk and had higher sensitivity for incident prostate cancer, high-grade cancers, and prostate cancer mortality than a simple approach based on age and PSA threshold.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 8, 2020
Online Publication Date Apr 29, 2021
Publication Date May 1, 2021
Deposit Date May 5, 2021
Publicly Available Date May 5, 2021
Journal British Journal of General Practice
Print ISSN 0960-1643
Electronic ISSN 1478-5242
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 71
Issue 706
Pages e364-e371
DOI https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20x714137
Keywords Family Practice
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5509991
Publisher URL https://bjgp.org/content/71/706/e364
Additional Information Previous version available: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5052492

Files





Related Outputs



You might also like



Downloadable Citations