Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Effects of lyophilized fecal filtrate compared with lyophilized donor stool on Clostridioides difficile recurrence: a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded trial

Kao, Dina; Wong, Karen; Lee, Christine; Steiner, Theodor; Franz, Rose; McDougall, Chelsea; Silva, Marisela; Schmidt, Thomas S.B.; Walter, Jens; Loebenberg, Raimar; Monaghan, Tanya M.; Giebelhaus, Ryland T.; Harynuk, James J.; Xu, Huiping; Yaskina, Maryna; MacDonald, Karen V.; Marshall, Deborah A.; Louie, Thomas

Authors

Dina Kao

Karen Wong

Christine Lee

Theodor Steiner

Rose Franz

Chelsea McDougall

Marisela Silva

Thomas S.B. Schmidt

Jens Walter

Raimar Loebenberg

Dr TANYA MONAGHAN Tanya.Monaghan@nottingham.ac.uk
CLINICAL ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IN LUMINAL GASTROENTEROLOGY

Ryland T. Giebelhaus

James J. Harynuk

Huiping Xu

Maryna Yaskina

Karen V. MacDonald

Deborah A. Marshall

Thomas Louie



Abstract

Background Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is highly effective in preventing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). However, it is not known whether live microbes are necessary in mediating FMT efficacy. This study aims to determine whether lyophilized sterile fecal filtrate (LSFF), free of live bacteria, is non-inferior to lyophilized donor stool (LFMT) in efficacy.

Methods This multi-center, non-inferiority (margin=10%), double blinded trial randomized 138 adult rCDI participants (at least 2 recurrences) to either LSFF or LFMT (1:1 ratio using a prespecified computer-generated randomization list with permutation blocks of 2 and 4, stratified by age of >65 or <65) between March 27, 2019 and November 6, 2023, with follow-up to March 22, 2024. Each treatment dose consisted of 15 oral capsules which appeared identical. Participants and investigators were not aware of treatment allocation. The primary outcome was proportion of participants without rCDI (absence of more than 3 Bristol type 6 or 7 bowel movements per 24 hours persisting more than 2 consecutive days) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included: (1) proportion of participants without rCDI at 24 weeks and (2) safety of interventions. Per protocol analysis was performed on primary and secondary outcomes.

Exploratory outcomes included changes at week 24 in (1) patient-reported health-related quality-of-life (EQ-5D-5L, CDIFF32) and work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI:SHP); and (2) fecal microbial composition. This completed trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03806803).

Findings Among 138 participants with at least 2 CDI recurrences (mean age [SD]: 61.2 [18.6] years; 91 women [65.9%]), 130 (94.2%) completed the trial, with 72 randomized to LSFF and 66 to LFMT. In per-protocol analysis, prevention of rCDI after 8 weeks occurred in 47/72 (65.3%) in LSFF and 57/65 (87.7%) in LFMT (difference, -22.4%, 1-sided 95% CI, -33.8% to ∞; P=0.96). Given the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -10%, the non-inferiority of LSFF to LFMT could not be established. Serious adverse events included 1 death and 5 hospitalizations (4 unrelated, 1 possibly related to interventions). The most common adverse events were abdominal discomfort and nausea, reported by 48/72 and 13/72 in LSFF and 36/66 and 21/66 in LFMT group, respectively (p>0.05).

Interpretation Among adults with rCDI, LSFF was less efficacious than LFMT in preventing rCDI over 8 weeks, supporting the crucial role of live microbes in mediating clinical efficacy.

Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Alberta Hospital Foundation; Alberta Health Services; Weston Foundation

Citation

Kao, D., Wong, K., Lee, C., Steiner, T., Franz, R., McDougall, C., Silva, M., Schmidt, T. S., Walter, J., Loebenberg, R., Monaghan, T. M., Giebelhaus, R. T., Harynuk, J. J., Xu, H., Yaskina, M., MacDonald, K. V., Marshall, D. A., & Louie, T. (in press). Effects of lyophilized fecal filtrate compared with lyophilized donor stool on Clostridioides difficile recurrence: a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology,

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 5, 2025
Deposit Date Jun 5, 2025
Journal The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Electronic ISSN 2468-1253
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/49910120