Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

An interview study to determine the experiences of cellulitis diagnosis amongst health care professionals in the UK

Patel, M.; Lee, S.I.; Levell, N.J.; Smart, P.; Kai, J.; Thomas, K.S.; Leighton, P.

An interview study to determine the experiences of cellulitis diagnosis amongst health care professionals in the UK Thumbnail


Authors

M. Patel

S.I. Lee

N.J. Levell

P. Smart

PAUL LEIGHTON PAUL.LEIGHTON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor of Applied Health Services Research



Abstract

Objectives: To explore health care professionals (HCPs) experiences and challenges in diagnosing suspected lower limb cellulitis.

Setting: UK nationwide.

Participants: 20 qualified HCPs, who had a minimum of two years clinical experience as a HCP in the national health service and had managed a clinical case of suspected cellulitis of the lower limb in the UK. HCPs were recruited from departments of dermatology (including a specialist cellulitis clinic), general practice, tissue viability, lymphoedema services, general surgery, emergency care and acute medicine. Purposive sampling was employed to ensure that participants included consultant doctors, trainee doctors and nurses across the specialties listed above. Participants were recruited through: national networks, HCPs who contributed to the cellulitis priority setting partnership (PSP), UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network, snowball sampling where participants helped recruit other participants, personal networks of the authors.

Primary and secondary outcomes: Primary outcome was to describe the key clinical features which inform the diagnosis of lower limb cellulitis. Secondary outcome was to explore the difficulties in making a diagnosis of lower limb cellulitis.

Results: The presentation of lower limb cellulitis changes as the episode runs its course. Therefore, different specialties see clinical features at varying stages of cellulitis. Clinical experience is essential to being confident in making a diagnosis, but even amongst experienced HCPs, there were differences in the clinical rationale of diagnosis. A group of core clinical features were suggested, many of which overlapped with alternative diagnoses. This emphasises how the diagnosis is challenging, with objective aids and a greater understanding of the mimics of cellulitis required.

Conclusion: Cellulitis is a complex diagnosis and has a variable clinical presentation at different stages. Although cellulitis is a common diagnosis to make, HCPs need to be mindful of alternative diagnoses.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 7, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 14, 2020
Publication Date Oct 14, 2020
Deposit Date Sep 25, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 14, 2020
Journal BMJ Open
Electronic ISSN 2044-6055
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Article Number e034692
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034692
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4923912
Publisher URL https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e034692

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations