Miss ELENI MICHALOPOULOU ELENI.MICHALOPOULOU@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
TECHNICAL SERVICES TEAM LEADER
Breast imaging readers’ performance in the PERFORMS test-set based assessment scheme within the MyPeBS international randomised study
Michalopoulou, Eleni; Darker, Iain; Iotti, Valentina; Slonim, Efrat; De Koning, Harry P.; Souza, Rodrigo Alcantara; Burrion, Jean-Benoit; De Montgolfier, Sandrine; Sabatier, Cécile Vissac; Guindy, Michal; Pattacini, Pierpaolo; Delaloge, Suzette; Gilbert, Fiona J.; Chen, Yan
Authors
Dr IAIN DARKER IAIN.DARKER1@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
SENIOR RESEARCH FELLOW
Valentina Iotti
Efrat Slonim
Harry P. De Koning
Rodrigo Alcantara Souza
Jean-Benoit Burrion
Sandrine De Montgolfier
Cécile Vissac Sabatier
Michal Guindy
Pierpaolo Pattacini
Suzette Delaloge
Fiona J. Gilbert
Professor YAN CHEN Yan.Chen@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF DIGITAL HEALTH
Abstract
Purpose
A survey conducted by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) in 2023 revealed significant variations in Quality Assurance (QA) practices across Europe. The UK encourages regular performance monitoring for screen readers. This study aimed to assess the variability in diagnostic performance among readers participating in a wider prospective randomised trial across multiple countries.
Method
In this retrospective multinational study, breast imaging readers from the MyPeBS clinical trial examined a test set of 40 challenging breast screening cases using the PERFORMS software, from March 2021 to February 2022. The challenging set, enriched with biopsy-proven cancers, aimed to differentiate readers by their level of diagnostic performance. Cancer detection and correct return to screen rates were calculated for each participant.
Results
A total of 110 readers from 6 countries completed the PERFORMS test set, while 88 also completed an accompanying questionnaire collecting information about their breast screening work and experience. The study revealed variability in cancer detection rates (M = 73.6 %, SD = 19.7 %, range 0.0 % to 100.0 %) and correct return to screen rates (M = 79.7 %, SD = 10.5 %, range 46.4 % to 100.0 %). Outliers with extremely low cancer detection (2.7 % of participants) and correct return to screen rates (1.8 % of participants) were also identified.
Conclusions
Breast imaging readers’ performance in test set-based assessments like PERFORMS can reflect real-world screening proficiency. The presence of outlier readers with low diagnostic performance on the test highlights the need for double reading and for standardised QA protocols to ensure patient safety and service efficiency.
Citation
Michalopoulou, E., Darker, I., Iotti, V., Slonim, E., De Koning, H. P., Souza, R. A., Burrion, J.-B., De Montgolfier, S., Sabatier, C. V., Guindy, M., Pattacini, P., Delaloge, S., Gilbert, F. J., & Chen, Y. (2025). Breast imaging readers’ performance in the PERFORMS test-set based assessment scheme within the MyPeBS international randomised study. European Journal of Radiology, 183, Article 111938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111938
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 16, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 18, 2025 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Jan 20, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 21, 2025 |
Journal | European Journal of Radiology |
Print ISSN | 0720-048X |
Electronic ISSN | 1872-7727 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 183 |
Article Number | 111938 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111938 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/44420974 |
Publisher URL | https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(25)00024-5/fulltext |
Files
PIIS0720048X25000245
(877 Kb)
PDF
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Defining the road map to a UK national lung cancer screening programme
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search