George J.W. Partridge
How Long Does It Take to Read a Mammogram? Investigating the Reading Time of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography
Partridge, George J.W.; Darker, Iain; James, Jonathan J.; Satchithananda, Keshthra; Sharma, Nisha; Valencia, Alexandra; Teh, William; Khan, Humaira; Muscat, Elizabeth; Michell, Michael J.; Chen, Yan
Authors
Dr IAIN DARKER IAIN.DARKER1@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
SENIOR RESEARCH FELLOW
Jonathan J. James
Keshthra Satchithananda
Nisha Sharma
Alexandra Valencia
William Teh
Humaira Khan
Elizabeth Muscat
Michael J. Michell
Professor YAN CHEN Yan.Chen@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF DIGITAL HEALTH
Abstract
Purpose
To analyse digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reading times in the screening setting, compared to 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM), and investigate the impact of reader experience and professional group on interpretation times.
Method
Reading time data were recorded in the PROSPECTS Trial, a prospective randomised trial comparing DBT plus FFDM or synthetic 2D mammography (S2D) to FFDM alone, in the National Health Service (NHS) breast screening programme, from January 2019-February 2023. Time to read DBT+FFDM or DBT+S2D and FFDM alone was calculated per case and reading times were compared between modalities using dependent T-tests. Reading times were compared between readers from different professional groups (radiologists and radiographer readers) and experience levels using independent T-tests. The learning curve effect of using DBT in screening on reading time was investigated using a Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results
Forty-eight readers interpreted 1,242 FFDM batches (34,210 FFDM cases) and 973 DBT batches (13,983 DBT cases). DBT reading time was doubled compared to FFDM (2.09 ± 0.64 min vs. 0.98 ± 0.30 min; p < 0.001), and DBT+S2D reading was longer than DBT + FFDM (2.24 ± 0.62 min vs. 2.04 ± 0.46 min; p = 0.006). No difference was identified in reading time between radiologists and radiographers (2.06 ± 0.71 min vs. 2.14 ± 0.46 min, respectively; p = 0.71). Readers with five or more years of experience reading DBT were quicker than those with less experience (1.86 ± 0.56 min vs. 2.37 ± 0.65 min; p = 0.008), and DBT reading time decreased after less than 9 months accrued screening experience (p = 0.01).
Conclusions
DBT reading times were double those of FFDM in the screening setting, but there was a short learning curve effect with readers showing significant improvements in reading times within the first nine months of DBT experience.
Citation
Partridge, G. J., Darker, I., James, J. J., Satchithananda, K., Sharma, N., Valencia, A., Teh, W., Khan, H., Muscat, E., Michell, M. J., & Chen, Y. (2024). How Long Does It Take to Read a Mammogram? Investigating the Reading Time of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography. European Journal of Radiology, 177, Article 111535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111535
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 27, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | May 28, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024-08 |
Deposit Date | Jun 17, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 18, 2024 |
Journal | European Journal of Radiology |
Print ISSN | 0720-048X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 177 |
Article Number | 111535 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111535 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/36006993 |
Publisher URL | https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(24)00251-1/fulltext |
Files
How Long Does It Take To Read A Mammogram
(1.8 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search