Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Greater hepatic lipid saturation is associated with impaired glycaemic regulation in men with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease but is not altered by 6 weeks of exercise training

Willis, Scott A.; Malaikah, Sundus; Bawden, Stephen J.; Sherry, Aron P.; Sargeant, Jack A.; Coull, Nicole A.; Bradley, Christopher R.; Rowlands, Alex; Naim, Iyad; Ennequin, Gaël; Yates, Thomas; Waheed, Ghazala; Gowland, Penny; Stensel, David J.; Webb, David R.; Davies, Melanie J.; Aithal, Guruprasad P.; King, James A.

Greater hepatic lipid saturation is associated with impaired glycaemic regulation in men with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease but is not altered by 6 weeks of exercise training Thumbnail


Authors

Scott A. Willis

Sundus Malaikah

Jack A. Sargeant

Nicole A. Coull

Alex Rowlands

Iyad Naim

Gaël Ennequin

Thomas Yates

Ghazala Waheed

David J. Stensel

David R. Webb

Melanie J. Davies

James A. King



Abstract

Aims: To examine the impact of impaired glycaemic regulation (IGR) and exercise training on hepatic lipid composition in men with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Materials and Methods: In Part A (cross‐sectional design), 40 men with MASLD (liver proton density fat fraction [PDFF] ≥5.56%) were recruited to one of two groups: (1) normal glycaemic regulation (NGR) group (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] < 42 mmol∙mol−1 [<6.0%]; n = 14) or (2) IGR group (HbA1c ≥ 42 mmol∙mol−1 [≥6.0%]; n = 26). In Part B (randomized controlled trial design), participants in the IGR group were randomized to one of two 6‐week interventions: (1) exercise training (EX; 70%–75% maximum heart rate; four sessions/week; n = 13) or (2) non‐exercise control (CON; n = 13). Saturated (SI; primary outcome), unsaturated (UI) and polyunsaturated (PUI) hepatic lipid indices were determined using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Additional secondary outcomes included liver PDFF, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR), peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), and plasma cytokeratin‐18 (CK18) M65, among others. Results: In Part A, hepatic SI was higher and hepatic UI was lower in the IGR versus the NGR group (p = 0.038), and this hepatic lipid profile was associated with higher HbA1c levels, FPG levels, HOMA‐IR and plasma CK18 M65 levels (r s ≥0.320). In Part B, hepatic lipid composition and liver PDFF were unchanged after EX versus CON (p ≥ 0.257), while FPG was reduced and VO2 peak was increased (p ≤ 0.030). ΔVO2 peak was inversely associated with Δhepatic SI (r = −0.433) and positively associated with Δhepatic UI and Δhepatic PUI (r ≥ 0.433). Conclusions: Impaired glycaemic regulation in MASLD is characterized by greater hepatic lipid saturation; however, this composition is not altered by 6 weeks of moderate‐intensity exercise training.

Citation

Willis, S. A., Malaikah, S., Bawden, S. J., Sherry, A. P., Sargeant, J. A., Coull, N. A., Bradley, C. R., Rowlands, A., Naim, I., Ennequin, G., Yates, T., Waheed, G., Gowland, P., Stensel, D. J., Webb, D. R., Davies, M. J., Aithal, G. P., & King, J. A. (2024). Greater hepatic lipid saturation is associated with impaired glycaemic regulation in men with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease but is not altered by 6 weeks of exercise training. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 26(9), 4030-4042. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15755

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 14, 2024
Online Publication Date Jul 8, 2024
Publication Date 2024-09
Deposit Date Jul 24, 2024
Publicly Available Date Jul 26, 2024
Journal Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Print ISSN 1462-8902
Electronic ISSN 1463-1326
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 26
Issue 9
Pages 4030-4042
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15755
Keywords exercise intervention, liver, glycaemic control, fatty liver disease
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/37301144
Publisher URL https://dom-pubs.pericles-prod.literatumonline.com/doi/10.1111/dom.15755
Additional Information Received: 2024-04-10; Accepted: 2024-06-14; Published: 2024-07-08