Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Improving economic evaluations in stroke: A report from the ESO Health Economics Working Group

Wilson, Alastair; on behalf of the ESO Health Economics Working group; Cadilhac, Dominique A; Kim, Joosup; Berge, Eivind; Patel, Anita; Ali, Myzoon; Saver, Jeffrey; Christensen, Hanne; Cuche, Matthieu; Crews, Sean; Wu, Olivia; Provoyeur, Marine; McMeekin, Peter; Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle; Ford, Gary A; Muhlemann, Natalia; Bath, Philip M; Abdul-Rahim, Azmil H; Sunnerhagen, Katharina; Meretoja, Atte; Thijs, Vincent; Weimar, Christian; Massaro, Ayrton; Lees, Kennedy R; Ranta, Annemarei

Improving economic evaluations in stroke: A report from the ESO Health Economics Working Group Thumbnail


Authors

Alastair Wilson

on behalf of the ESO Health Economics Working group

Dominique A Cadilhac

Joosup Kim

Eivind Berge

Anita Patel

Myzoon Ali

Jeffrey Saver

Hanne Christensen

Matthieu Cuche

Sean Crews

Olivia Wu

Marine Provoyeur

Peter McMeekin

Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

Gary A Ford

Natalia Muhlemann

PHILIP BATH philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk
Stroke Association Professor of Stroke Medicine

Azmil H Abdul-Rahim

Katharina Sunnerhagen

Atte Meretoja

Vincent Thijs

Christian Weimar

Ayrton Massaro

Kennedy R Lees

Annemarei Ranta



Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke therapies are varied and inconsistently described. An objective of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Health Economics Working Group is to standardise and improve the economic evaluations of interventions for stroke. Methods: The ESO Health Economics Working Group and additional experts were contacted to develop a protocol and a guidance document for data collection for economic evaluations of stroke therapies. A modified Delphi approach, including a survey and consensus processes, was used to agree on content. We also asked the participants about resources that could be shared to improve economic evaluations of interventions for stroke. Results: Of 28 experts invited, 16 (57%) completed the initial survey, with representation from universities, government, and industry. More than half of the survey respondents endorsed 13 specific items to include in a standard resource use questionnaire. Preferred functional/quality of life outcome measures to use for economic evaluations were the modified Rankin Scale (14 respondents, 88%) and the EQ-5D instrument (11 respondents, 69%). Of the 12 respondents who had access to data used in economic evaluations, 10 (83%) indicated a willingness to share data. A protocol template and a guidance document for data collection were developed and are presented in this article. Conclusion: The protocol template and guidance document for data collection will support a more standardised and transparent approach for economic evaluations of stroke care.

Citation

Wilson, A., on behalf of the ESO Health Economics Working group, Cadilhac, D. A., Kim, J., Berge, E., Patel, A., …Ranta, A. (2020). Improving economic evaluations in stroke: A report from the ESO Health Economics Working Group. European Stroke Journal, 5(2), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987319897466

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 8, 2019
Online Publication Date Jan 27, 2020
Publication Date 2020-06
Deposit Date Dec 16, 2019
Publicly Available Date Dec 16, 2019
Journal European Stroke Journal
Electronic ISSN 2396-9881
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 5
Issue 2
Pages 184-192
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987319897466
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3577805
Publisher URL https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2396987319897466

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations