Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Extending the use of routine outcome monitoring: Predicting long-term outcomes in cognitive behavioral therapy for severe health anxiety

Malins, Sam; Moghaddam, Nima; Morriss, Richard; Schr�der, Thomas

Extending the use of routine outcome monitoring: Predicting long-term outcomes in cognitive behavioral therapy for severe health anxiety Thumbnail


Authors

Sam Malins

Nima Moghaddam

RICHARD MORRISS richard.morriss@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Psychiatry and Community Mental Health

Thomas Schr�der



Abstract

Objective: Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) is a well-evidenced means of improving psychotherapy’s effectiveness. However, it is unclear how meaningful ROM is for problems that span physical and mental health, such as severe health anxiety. Physical and mental health comorbidities are common amongst severe health anxiety sufferers and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a recommended treatment.
Method: Seventy-nine participants received CBT for severe health anxiety in a clinical trial. The Outcome Rating Scale (ORS: a ROM assessment of wellbeing) was completed at each session. Multilevel modeling assessed whether last-session ORS predicted health anxiety and other outcomes over 12-month follow-up. Similar models were developed using health anxiety as a comparative outcome-predictor. Outcome-improvements of treatment-responders with sudden gains were compared to those of non-sudden-gainers.
Results: Last-session ORS scores predicted all outcomes up to 12 months later, with a comparable predictive effect to health anxiety. Sudden-gainers on the ORS reported significantly greater improvement in depression, functioning, and wellbeing, but no difference in health anxiety or other measures.
Conclusion: The ORS may be a feasible, overall estimate of health, functioning, and quality of life in psychotherapy for severe health anxiety. Sudden gains on the ORS may be clinically meaningful with respect to some long-term outcomes.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 4, 2019
Online Publication Date Aug 23, 2019
Publication Date 2020
Deposit Date Oct 9, 2019
Publicly Available Date Aug 24, 2020
Journal Psychotherapy Research
Print ISSN 1050-3307
Electronic ISSN 1468-4381
Publisher Routledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 30
Issue 5
Pages 662-674
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1657250
Keywords Clinical Psychology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2792157
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2019.1657250
Additional Information Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=tpsr20; Received: 2019-01-30; Revised: 2019-07-29; Accepted: 2019-08-04; Published: 2019-08-23