Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Ondansetron for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: randomised controlled trial

Gunn, David; Topan, Rabia; Fried, Ron; Holloway, Ivana; Brindle, Richard; Hartley, Suzanne; Barnard, Lorna; Corsetti, Maura; Scott, S Mark; Farmer, Adam; Akbar, Ayesha; Eugenicos, Maria; Trudgill, Nigel; Kapur, Kapil; McLaughlin, John; Sanders, David S; Ramadas, Arvind; Whorwell, Peter; Houghton, Lesley; Dinning, Phil G; Aziz, Qasim; Ford, Alexander C; Farrin, Amanda; Spiller, Robin

Authors

David Gunn

Rabia Topan

Ron Fried

Ivana Holloway

Richard Brindle

Suzanne Hartley

Lorna Barnard

MAURA CORSETTI Maura.Corsetti@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Associate Professor

S Mark Scott

Adam Farmer

Ayesha Akbar

Maria Eugenicos

Nigel Trudgill

Kapil Kapur

John McLaughlin

David S Sanders

Arvind Ramadas

Peter Whorwell

Lesley Houghton

Phil G Dinning

Qasim Aziz

Alexander C Ford

Amanda Farrin

Profile image of ROBIN SPILLER

ROBIN SPILLER ROBIN.SPILLER@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Gastroenterology



Abstract

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea is characterised by frequent, loose or watery stools with associated urgency, resulting in marked reduction of quality of life. Ondansetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, has been shown to benefit patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of ondansetron in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea.

Design: Phase III, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial in 400 patients, with embedded mechanistic studies.

Setting: Hospital, primary care and community.

Participants: Eighty participants meeting Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea.

Intervention: Ondansetron 4 mg (dose titrated up to two tablets three times a day) or matched placebo for 12 weeks.

Main outcome measures: Clinical – Primary patient-reported end point was % ‘Food and Drug Administration-defined responders’ over 12 weeks. Secondary end points were worst abdominal pain intensity, worst urgency, stool consistency, stool frequency, anxiety, depression and dyspepsia at 12 and 16 weeks.

Main outcome measures: Mechanistic – Whole gut transit time, faecal water, protease (FP), bile acids and assessment of rectal sensitivity using a barostat.

Results: Clinical – The study closed early due to slow recruitment. Between 1 January 2018 and 11 May 2020, 80 patients were recruited and randomised (20% of target), 37 to ondansetron, 43 to placebo. Discontinuations (4 ondansetron; 2 placebo) meant 75 completed the 12-week trial treatment. There were four protocol violations. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 15 (40.5%) on ondansetron were primary end-point responders (95% CI 24.7% to 56.4%), and 12 (27.9%) on placebo (95% CI 14.5% to 41.3%), p = 0.19, adjusted OR 1.93 (0.73, 5.11). Pain intensity reduction occurred in 17 (46.0%) on ondansetron (95% CI 29.9% to 62.0%) and 16 (37.2%) on placebo (95% CI 22.8% to 51.7%), p = 0.32. Improvement in stool consistency occurred in 25 (67.6%) on ondansetron (95% CI 52.5% to 82.7%) and 22 (51.2%) on placebo (95% CI 36.2% to 66.1%), p = 0.07. Use of rescue medication, loperamide, was lower on ondansetron [7 (18.9%) vs. 17 (39.5%)]. Average stool consistency in the final month of treatment reduced significantly more on ondansetron, adjusted mean difference –0.5 [standard error (SE) 0.25, 95% CI (–1.0 to –0.02), p = 0.042]. Ondansetron improved dyspepsia score (SFLDQ), adjusted mean difference –3.2 points [SE 1.43, 95% CI (–6.1 to –0.4), p = 0.028]. There were no serious adverse events.

Mechanistic – mean (SD). Ondansetron increased whole gut transit time between baseline and week 12 by 3.8 (9.1) hours on ondansetron, significantly more than on placebo –2.2 (10.3), p = 0.01. Mean volume to reach urgency threshold using the barostat increased on ondansetron by 84 (61) ml and 38 (48) ml on placebo, n = 8, p = 0.26. Ondansetron did not significantly alter protease, faecal water or bile acids. Changes in referral pathways substantially reduced referrals, impairing recruitment, which meant the study was underpowered.

Conclusion: Our results are consistent with previous studies and confirmed ondansetron improves stool consistency and urgency but showed minor effect on pain. We plan to undertake a simplified version of this trial overcoming the changed referral pathways by recruiting in primary care, using software linked to primary care records to identify and randomise patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea to ondansetron or placebo and remotely follow their progress; thus minimising barriers to recruitment.

Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN17508514.

Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme and will be published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 10, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Citation

Gunn, D., Topan, R., Fried, R., Holloway, I., Brindle, R., Hartley, S., …Spiller, R. (2023). Ondansetron for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: randomised controlled trial. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation, 10(9), 1-154. https://doi.org/10.3310/ytfw7874

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 11, 2023
Publication Date 2023-10
Deposit Date Apr 4, 2024
Publicly Available Date Apr 9, 2024
Journal Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation
Print ISSN 2050-4365
Electronic ISSN 2050-4373
Publisher NIHR Journals Library
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Issue 9
Pages 1-154
DOI https://doi.org/10.3310/ytfw7874
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/27381179
Publisher URL https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/eme/YTFW7874#/abstract
Additional Information Free to read: This content has been made freely available to all.; contractual_start_date: 02-2017; editorial review begun: 05-2022; Accepted for publication: 02-2023

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations