Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Is the apparently protective effect of maternal nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) used in pregnancy on infant development explained by smoking cessation?: secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial.

Iyen, Barbara; Vaz, Luis R; Taggar, Jaspal; Cooper, Sue; Lewis, Sarah; Coleman, Tim

Is the apparently protective effect of maternal nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) used in pregnancy on infant development explained by smoking cessation?: secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial. Thumbnail


Authors

BARBARA IYEN Barbara.Iyen2@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Assistant Professor in Primary Care

Luis R Vaz

Dr JASPAL TAGGAR JASPAL.TAGGAR@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Primary Care and Medical Education

Sue Cooper

TIM COLEMAN tim.coleman@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Primary Care



Abstract

Objective: To investigate relationships between maternal smoking status in pregnancy and infant development. The largest RCT of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for smoking cessation in pregnancy, the Smoking and Nicotine in Pregnancy (SNAP) trial, found that at one month after randomisation, smoking cessation rates were doubled in the NRT group compared to the placebo group. At delivery, there was no significant difference in cessation rates between groups. Surprisingly, infants born to women randomised to NRT were more likely to have unimpaired development at 2 years. We hypothesized that this apparently protective effect was due to smoking cessation caused by NRT and so, investigate this relationship using the same cohort.

Design: Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Seven antenatal hospitals in the Midlands and North-West England.

Participants: Eight hundred and eighty-four (884) pregnant smokers randomised to receive either NRT patches or visually-identical placebo in the SNAP trial. Participants’ smoking behaviour were recorded at randomisation, one month after their target quit date and at delivery.

Methods: Using logistic regression models, we investigated associations between participants’ smoking measures and infant development (assessed using the Ages and Stages questionnaire) at 2 years.

Main outcome measures: 2-year infant development.

Results: Developmental impairment was reported for 12.7% of study 2 year olds. Maternal heaviness of smoking at randomisation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.26, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.82-1.96, p = 0.091), validated smoking abstinence recorded at one month after a quit date (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.60-1.74, p = 0.914) and validated smoking abstinence recorded at one month after a quit date and at the end of pregnancy (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.81-2.85, p = 0.795) were not independently associated with infant developmental impairment at 2 years.

Conclusion: We found no evidence that NRT treatment improved infants' developmental outcomes through smoking cessation.

Citation

Iyen, B., Vaz, L. R., Taggar, J., Cooper, S., Lewis, S., & Coleman, T. (2019). Is the apparently protective effect of maternal nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) used in pregnancy on infant development explained by smoking cessation?: secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 9(7), Article e024923. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024923

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 13, 2019
Online Publication Date Jul 11, 2019
Publication Date 2019-06
Deposit Date Jun 18, 2019
Publicly Available Date Jul 18, 2019
Journal BMJ Open
Electronic ISSN 2044-6055
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 9
Issue 7
Article Number e024923
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024923
Keywords Smoking in pregnancy; Maternal smoking; Child development; Developmental impairment
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2202426
Publisher URL https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/7/e024923