Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Statistical analysis plans for two randomised controlled trials of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention: impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis (NEON) and people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems (NEON-O)

Robinson, Clare; Newby, Chris; Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan; Llewellyn-Beardsley, Joy; Ng, Fiona; Elliott, Rachel A; Slade, Mike

Statistical analysis plans for two randomised controlled trials of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention: impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis (NEON) and people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems (NEON-O) Thumbnail


Authors

Clare Robinson

CHRISTOPHER NEWBY Christopher.Newby@nottingham.ac.uk
Senior Quantitative Methods Adviser and Researcher

Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley

Profile image of FIONA NG

DR FIONA NG FIONA.NG@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Principal Research Fellow

Rachel A Elliott

MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Mental Health Recovery and Social Inclusion



Abstract

Background
Mental health recovery narratives are a first-hand account of an individual’s recovery from mental health distress, access to narratives can aid recovery. The NEON Intervention is a web-application providing access to a managed collection of narratives. We present the statistical analysis plan for assessing the effectiveness of the NEON Intervention in improving quality of life at one year post randomisation. We pay particular focus on the statistical challenges encountered due to the online nature of this trial.

Methods and design
The NEON Intervention is assessed in two trial populations, one for people with experience of psychosis in the last five years, and mental health distress in the last six months (NEON Trial) and one for people with experience of non-psychosis mental health problems(NEON-O Trial). Both NEON trials are two-arm randomised controlled superiority trials comparing the effectiveness of the NEON Intervention with usual care. The target sample size is to 684 randomised participants for NEON and 994 for NEON-O. Participants were randomised centrally in a 1:1 ratio.

Results
The primary outcome is the mean score of subjective items on the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality-of-Life questionnaire (MANSA) at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes are scores from the Herth Hope Index, Mental Health Confidence Scale, Meaning of Life questionnaire, CORE-10 questionnaire and Euroqol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L).

Conclusion
This manuscript is the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the NEON trials. Any post hoc analysis, such as those requested by journal reviewers will be clearly labelled as such in the final trial reporting.

Trial registration
Both trials were prospectively registered. NEON Trial: ISRCTN11152837, registered 13 August 2018, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11152837. NEON-O Trial: ISRCTN63197153, registered 9 January 2020, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN63197153

Citation

Robinson, C., Newby, C., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Llewellyn-Beardsley, J., Ng, F., Elliott, R. A., & Slade, M. (2023). Statistical analysis plans for two randomised controlled trials of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention: impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis (NEON) and people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems (NEON-O). Trials, 24, Article 343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07246-8

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 13, 2023
Online Publication Date May 20, 2023
Publication Date May 20, 2023
Deposit Date Mar 24, 2023
Publicly Available Date May 25, 2023
Journal Trials
Electronic ISSN 1745-6215
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Article Number 343
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07246-8
Keywords Recovery Narrative, Psychosis, Mental Health, Statistical analysis plan, Online intervention
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/18815737
Publisher URL https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-023-07246-8