Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents: comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses

Usman, Adeela; Lewis, Sarah; Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn; Long, Annabelle; Housley, Gemma; Jordan, Jake; Gage, Heather; Dening, Tom; Gladman, John R F; Gordon, Adam L

Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents: comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses Thumbnail


Authors

Adeela Usman

Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith

Gemma Housley

Jake Jordan

Heather Gage

Profile Image

TOM DENING TOM.DENING@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Clinical Professor in Dementia Research

JOHN GLADMAN john.gladman@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Medicine of Older People

ADAM GORDON Adam.Gordon@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of The Care of Older People



Abstract

Introduction: Care home residents are often unable to complete Health Related Quality of Life questionnaires for themselves because of prevalent cognitive impairment. This study compared care home resident and staff proxy responses for two measures, the EQ-5D-5L and HowRU.

Methods: A prospective cohort study recruited residents ≥ 60 years across 24 care homes who were not receiving short stay, respite or terminal care. Resident and staff proxy EQ-5D-5L and HowRu responses were collected monthly for three months. Weighted kappa statistics and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) adjusted for clustering at the care home level were used to measure agreement between resident and proxies for each time point. The effect of staff and resident baseline variables on agreement was considered using a multilevel mixed-effect regression model.

Results: 117, 109 and 104 matched pairs completed the questionnaires at 1, 2 and 3 months respectively. When clustering was controlled for, agreement between resident and staff proxy EQ-5D-5L responses was fair for mobility (ICC: 0.29) and slight for all other domains (ICC  0.20). EQ-5D Index and Quality Adjusted Life Year scores (proxy scores higher than residents) showed better agreement than EQ-5D-VAS (residents scores higher than proxy). HowRU showed only slight agreement (ICC  0.20) between residents and proxies. Staff and resident characteristics did not influence level of agreement for either index.

Citation

Usman, A., Lewis, S., Hinsliff-Smith, K., Long, A., Housley, G., Jordan, J., …Gordon, A. L. (2019). Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents: comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses. Age and Ageing, 48(3), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy191

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 9, 2018
Online Publication Date Jan 7, 2019
Publication Date 2019-05
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jan 10, 2019
Journal Age and Ageing
Print ISSN 0002-0729
Electronic ISSN 1468-2834
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 48
Issue 3
Pages 407–413
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy191
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1247313
Publisher URL https://academic.oup.com/ageing/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ageing/afy191/5274649