Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Estimation of cortical magnification from positional error in normally sighted and amblyopic subjects

Hussain, Zahra; Svensson, Carl-Magnus; Besle, Julien; Webb, Ben S.; Barrett, Brendan T.; McGraw, Paul

Authors

Zahra Hussain

Carl-Magnus Svensson

Julien Besle

Ben S. Webb

Brendan T. Barrett

PAUL MCGRAW paul.mcgraw@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Visual Neuroscience



Abstract

We describe a method for deriving the linear cortical magnification factor from positional error across the visual field. We compared magnification obtained from this method between normally sighted individuals and amblyopic individuals, who receive atypical visual input during development. The cortical magnification factor was derived for each subject from positional error at 32 locations in the visual field, using an established model of conformal mapping between retinal and cortical coordinates. Magnification of the normally sighted group matched estimates from previous physiological and neuroimaging studies in humans, confirming the validity of the approach. The estimate of magnification for the amblyopic group was significantly lower than the normal group: by 4.4 mm deg−1 at 1° eccentricity, assuming a constant scaling factor for both groups. These estimates, if correct, suggest a role for early visual experience in establishing retinotopic mapping in cortex. We discuss the implications of altered cortical magnification for cortical size, and consider other neural changes that may account for the amblyopic results.

Citation

Hussain, Z., Svensson, C., Besle, J., Webb, B. S., Barrett, B. T., & McGraw, P. (2015). Estimation of cortical magnification from positional error in normally sighted and amblyopic subjects. Journal of Vision, 15(2), doi:10.1167/15.2.25

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 10, 2014
Online Publication Date Feb 26, 2015
Publication Date Feb 26, 2015
Deposit Date Apr 13, 2018
Publisher Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 15
Issue 2
Article Number 25
DOI https://doi.org/10.1167/15.2.25
Public URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25761341
Publisher URL https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2213265