A Batool
Gaze correlates of view preference: Comparing natural and urban scenes
Batool, A; Rutherford, P; McGraw, P; Ledgeway, T; Altomonte, S
Authors
Dr PETER RUTHERFORD PETER.RUTHERFORD@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Professor PAUL MCGRAW paul.mcgraw@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE
T Ledgeway
S Altomonte
Abstract
When looking out of a window, natural views are usually associated with restorative qualities and are given a higher preference than urban scenes. Previous research has shown that gaze behaviour might differ based on the natural or urban content of views. A lower number of fixations has been associated with the aesthetic evaluation of natural scenes while, when looking at an urban environment, a high preference has been correlated with more exploratory gaze behaviours. To characterise gaze correlates of view preference across natural and urban scenes, we collected and analysed experimental data featuring subjective preference ratings, eye-tracking measures, verbal reasoning associated with preference and nature relatedness scores. Consistent with the literature, our results confirm that natural scenes are more preferred than urban views and that gaze behaviours depend on view type and preference. Observing natural scenes was characterised by lower numbers of fixations and saccades, and longer fixation durations, compared to urban views. However, for both view types, most preferred scenes led to more fixations and saccades. Our findings also showed that nature relatedness may be correlated with visual exploration of scenes. Individual preferences and personality attributes, therefore, should be accounted for in studies on view preference and gaze behaviour.
Citation
Batool, A., Rutherford, P., McGraw, P., Ledgeway, T., & Altomonte, S. (2022). Gaze correlates of view preference: Comparing natural and urban scenes. Lighting Research and Technology, 54(6), 576-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535211055703
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 7, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 29, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2022-10 |
Deposit Date | Oct 21, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 29, 2021 |
Journal | Lighting Research and Technology |
Print ISSN | 1477-1535 |
Electronic ISSN | 1477-0938 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 54 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 576-594 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535211055703 |
Keywords | Electrical and Electronic Engineering |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/6507243 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14771535211055703 |
Files
LRT-21-0080
(565 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Daylighting Performance Simulation: Prediction Accuracy / Processing Speed Trade-off
(2023)
Journal Article
Convenience in a residence with demand response: A system dynamics simulation model
(2022)
Journal Article
A systems dynamics approach to the bottom-up simulation of residential appliance load
(2021)
Journal Article
Window Views: Difference of Perception during the COVID-19 Lockdown
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search