Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Assessing the reliability of web-based measurements of visual function

Leadbeater, Richard J.; McGraw, Paul; Ledgeway, Timothy

Assessing the reliability of web-based measurements of visual function Thumbnail


Authors

Richard J. Leadbeater

PAUL MCGRAW paul.mcgraw@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Visual Neuroscience

Timothy Ledgeway



Abstract

Many behavioural phenomena have been replicated using web-based experiments, but evaluation of the agreement between objective measures of web- and lab-based performance is required if scientists and clinicians are to reap the benefits of web-based testing. In this study, we investigated the reliability of a task which assesses early visual cortical function by evaluating the well-known ‘oblique effect’ (we are better at seeing horizontal and vertical edges than tilted ones) and the levels of agreement between remote, web-based measures and lab-based measures. Sixty-nine young participants (mean age, 21.8 years) performed temporal and spatial versions of a web-based, two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) orientation-identification task. In each case, orientation-identification thresholds (the minimum orientation difference at which a standard orientation could be reliably distinguished from a rotated comparison) were measured for cardinal (horizontal and vertical) and oblique orientations. Reliability was assessed in a subsample of 18 participants who performed the same tasks under laboratory conditions. Robust oblique effects were found, such that thresholds were substantially lower for cardinal orientations compared to obliques, for both web- and lab-based measures of the temporal and spatial 2AFC tasks. Crucially, web- and lab-based orientation-identification thresholds showed high levels of agreement, demonstrating the suitability of web-based testing for assessments of early visual cortical function. Future studies should assess the reliability of similar web-based tasks in clinical populations to evaluate their adoption into clinical settings, either to screen for visual anomalies or to assess changes in performance associated with progression of disease severity.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 19, 2023
Online Publication Date Jan 23, 2023
Publication Date 2024-01
Deposit Date Jan 26, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jan 26, 2023
Journal Behavior Research Methods
Print ISSN 1554-351X
Electronic ISSN 1554-3528
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 56
Pages 406-416
DOI https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02057-2
Keywords General Psychology; Psychology (miscellaneous); Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous); Developmental and Educational Psychology; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/16501906
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-022-02057-2

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations