Edward J.N. Stupple
Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): a measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking
Stupple, Edward J.N.; Maratos, Frances A.; Elander, James; Hunt, Thomas E.; Cheung, Kevin Y.F.; Aubeeluck, Aimee
Authors
Frances A. Maratos
James Elander
Thomas E. Hunt
Kevin Y.F. Cheung
AIMEE AUBEELUCK aimee.aubeeluck@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Health Psychology Education
Abstract
Critical thinking is an important focus in higher education and is essential for good academic achievement. We report the development of a tool to measure critical thinking for three purposes: (i) to evaluate student perceptions and attitudes about critical thinking, (ii) to identify students in need of support to develop their critical thinking, and (iii) to predict academic performance. Seventy-seven items were generated from focus groups, interviews and the critical thinking literature. Data were collected from 133 psychology students. Factor Analysis revealed three latent factors based on a reduced set of 27 items. These factors were characterised as: Confidence in Critical Thinking; Valuing Critical Thinking; and Misconceptions. Reliability analysis demonstrated that the sub-scales were reliable. Convergent validity with measures of grade point average and argumentation skill was shown, with significant correlations between subscales and validation measures. Most notably, in multiple regression analysis, the three sub-scales from the new questionnaire substantially increased the variance in grade point average accounted for by measures of reflective thinking and argumentation. To sum, the resultant scale offers a measure that is simple to administer, can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify students who need support in developing their critical thinking skills, and can also predict academic performance.
Citation
Stupple, E. J., Maratos, F. A., Elander, J., Hunt, T. E., Cheung, K. . Y., & Aubeeluck, A. (2017). Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): a measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 22, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 24, 2016 |
Publication Date | Mar 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Dec 5, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 5, 2016 |
Journal | Thinking Skills and Creativity |
Print ISSN | 1871-1871 |
Electronic ISSN | 1878-0423 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 23 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007 |
Keywords | Critical thinking; Learning; Teaching; Cognitive reflection; Questionnaire; Argumentation; Dual process theory |
Public URL | http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/39180 |
Publisher URL | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187116302000 |
Copyright Statement | Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
Files
CT paperNov2016_final.pdf
(634 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
You might also like
Both introduced and extinct: the fallow deer of Roman Mallorca
(2016)
Journal Article
New strigolactone analogs as plant hormones with low activities in the rhizosphere
(2014)
Journal Article
Protein–like fully reversible tetramerisation and super-association of an aminocellulose
(2014)
Journal Article