Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparing drivers’ gap acceptance for cars and motorcycles at junctions using an adaptive staircase methodology

Robbins, Chloe J.; Allen, Harriet A.; Chapman, Peter

Comparing drivers’ gap acceptance for cars and motorcycles at junctions using an adaptive staircase methodology Thumbnail


Authors

Chloe J. Robbins

HARRIET ALLEN H.A.Allen@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Lifespan Psychology



Abstract

A disproportionate number of road deaths occur at intersections where one vehicle is a motorcycle. Previous research has not systematically varied the type of vehicles presented in a controlled environment.
We compared drivers’ (n=54) gap acceptance when either a car or motorcycle was approaching a junction. We used a QUEST adaptive staircase to estimate gap acceptance thresholds for cars and motorcycles separately. On each trial, drivers saw a car approaching from the left and a vehicle (car or motorcycle) approaching from the right. The driver had to stop for the car from the left, but could choose whether to pull out in front of the vehicle from the right, or to wait for it to pass. Participants completed the task in either a medium-fidelity simulator (steering wheel and pedals, 180-degree screen) or a high-fidelity simulator (fully instrumented car, 360-degree screen).
Participants accepted significantly smaller (riskier) gaps in front of motorcycles than in front of cars, particularly in the high-fidelity simulator. The speed of crossing the junction did not differ between vehicle types, meaning that drivers were closer to the motorcycle than the car during the manoeuvre. There was one instance that appeared to replicate a ‘Look But Fail To See’ error, where a participant pulled out in front of an oncoming motorcycle resulting in a crash. This suggests that drivers accept riskier gaps around motorcycles than cars, which may be due to a difference in attitude towards different vehicles or differences in optic flow properties. These results help to explain the disproportionate involvement of motorcycles in real junction crashes.

Citation

Robbins, C. J., Allen, H. A., & Chapman, P. (2018). Comparing drivers’ gap acceptance for cars and motorcycles at junctions using an adaptive staircase methodology. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 944-954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.023

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 29, 2018
Online Publication Date Aug 10, 2018
Publication Date Oct 30, 2018
Deposit Date Jul 31, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 28, 2024
Journal Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Print ISSN 1369-8478
Electronic ISSN 1873-5517
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 58
Pages 944-954
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.023
Keywords Gap Acceptance; Threshold; Junctions; Motorcycles; Look But Fail To See; Adaptive Staircase
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/948069
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847817305454?via%3Dihub

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations