LAURA HOWELLS LAURA.HOWELLS1@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Senior Research Fellow
How should minimally important change (MIC) scores for the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) be interpreted?: a validation using varied methods
Howells, Laura; Ratib, Sonia; Chalmers, J.R.; Bradshaw, Lucy; Thomas, K.S.
Authors
SONIA GRAN SONIA.GRAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor
J.R. Chalmers
LUCY BRADSHAW lucy.bradshaw@nottingham.ac.uk
Senior Research Fellow
Professor KIM THOMAS KIM.THOMAS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Applied Dermatology Research
Abstract
Background
The Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), scored 0-28, is the core outcome instrument recommended for measuring patient-reported atopic eczema symptoms in clinical trials. To date, two published studies have broadly concurred that the MIC of the POEM is 3 points. Further assessment of the minimally important change (MIC) of POEM in different populations, and using a variety of methods, will improve interpretability of the POEM in research and clinical practice.
Objectives
To calculate the smallest detectable change in the POEM and estimate the MIC of the POEM using a variety of methods in a trial dataset of children with moderate to severe atopic eczema.
Methods
This study used distribution-based and anchor-based methods to calculate the MIC of the POEM in children with moderate to severe eczema.
Results
Data was collected from 300 children. The smallest detectable change was 2.12. The MIC estimates were 1.07 (0.2 SD) and 2.68 (0.5 SD) based on distribution-based methods, were 3.09 to 6.13 based on patient-reported anchor-based methods, and were 3.23 to 5.38 based on investigator-reported anchor-based methods.
Conclusions
We recommend the following thresholds are used to interpret changes in POEM scores: ≤ 2, unlikely to be a change beyond measurement error; 2.1 to 2.9, a small change detected that is likely to be beyond measurement error but may not be clinically important; 3 to 3.9, probably a clinically important change; 4+, very likely to be a clinically important change.
Citation
Howells, L., Ratib, S., Chalmers, J., Bradshaw, L., & Thomas, K. (2018). How should minimally important change (MIC) scores for the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) be interpreted?: a validation using varied methods. British Journal of Dermatology, 178(5), https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16367
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 11, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 21, 2018 |
Publication Date | May 31, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Mar 2, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 2, 2018 |
Journal | British Journal of Dermatology |
Print ISSN | 0007-0963 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2133 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 178 |
Issue | 5 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16367 |
Keywords | Minimally important change; Minimum clinically important difference; Smallest detectable change; Atopic eczema; Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/935848 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16367 |
Contract Date | Mar 2, 2018 |
Files
Howells_et_al-2018-British_Journal_of_Dermatology.pdf
(324 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
You might also like
Do patient characteristics matter when calculating sample size for eczema clinical trials?
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search