Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

How should minimally important change (MIC) scores for the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) be interpreted?: a validation using varied methods

Howells, Laura; Ratib, Sonia; Chalmers, J.R.; Bradshaw, Lucy; Thomas, K.S.

How should minimally important change (MIC) scores for the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) be interpreted?: a validation using varied methods Thumbnail


Authors

LAURA HOWELLS LAURA.HOWELLS1@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Senior Research Fellow

SONIA GRAN SONIA.GRAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor

J.R. Chalmers



Abstract

Background

The Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), scored 0-28, is the core outcome instrument recommended for measuring patient-reported atopic eczema symptoms in clinical trials. To date, two published studies have broadly concurred that the MIC of the POEM is 3 points. Further assessment of the minimally important change (MIC) of POEM in different populations, and using a variety of methods, will improve interpretability of the POEM in research and clinical practice.

Objectives

To calculate the smallest detectable change in the POEM and estimate the MIC of the POEM using a variety of methods in a trial dataset of children with moderate to severe atopic eczema.

Methods

This study used distribution-based and anchor-based methods to calculate the MIC of the POEM in children with moderate to severe eczema.

Results

Data was collected from 300 children. The smallest detectable change was 2.12. The MIC estimates were 1.07 (0.2 SD) and 2.68 (0.5 SD) based on distribution-based methods, were 3.09 to 6.13 based on patient-reported anchor-based methods, and were 3.23 to 5.38 based on investigator-reported anchor-based methods.

Conclusions

We recommend the following thresholds are used to interpret changes in POEM scores: ≤ 2, unlikely to be a change beyond measurement error; 2.1 to 2.9, a small change detected that is likely to be beyond measurement error but may not be clinically important; 3 to 3.9, probably a clinically important change; 4+, very likely to be a clinically important change.

Citation

Howells, L., Ratib, S., Chalmers, J., Bradshaw, L., & Thomas, K. (2018). How should minimally important change (MIC) scores for the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) be interpreted?: a validation using varied methods. British Journal of Dermatology, 178(5), https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16367

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 11, 2018
Online Publication Date Jan 21, 2018
Publication Date May 31, 2018
Deposit Date Mar 2, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 2, 2018
Journal British Journal of Dermatology
Print ISSN 0007-0963
Electronic ISSN 1365-2133
Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 178
Issue 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16367
Keywords Minimally important change; Minimum clinically important difference; Smallest detectable change; Atopic eczema; Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/935848
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16367
Contract Date Mar 2, 2018

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations