Brunella Bruno
Market reaction to bank liquidity regulation
Bruno, Brunella; Onali, Enrico; Schaeck, Klaus
Authors
Enrico Onali
Klaus Schaeck
Abstract
We measure market reactions to announcements concerning liquidity regulation, a key innovation in the Basel framework. Our initial results show that liquidity regulation attracts negative abnormal returns. However, the price responses are less pronounced when coinciding announcements concerning capital regulation are backed out, suggesting that markets do not consider liquidity regulation to be binding. Bank- and country-specific characteristics also matter. Liquid balance sheets and high charter values increase abnormal returns whereas smaller long-term funding mismatches reduce abnormal returns. Banks located in countries with large government debt and tight interbank conditions or with prior domestic liquidity regulation display lower abnormal returns.
Citation
Bruno, B., Onali, E., & Schaeck, K. (2018). Market reaction to bank liquidity regulation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(2), 899-935. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017001089
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 6, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 4, 2018 |
Publication Date | Apr 30, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Jun 19, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 28, 2024 |
Journal | Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis |
Print ISSN | 0022-1090 |
Electronic ISSN | 1756-6916 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 53 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 899-935 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017001089 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/929365 |
Publisher URL | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis/article/market-reaction-to-bank-liquidity-regulation/B1E0832663AC0854937B0470BD658A1F |
Additional Information | This article has been published in a revised form in Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis http://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017001089. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018. |
Files
Market Reaction to bank.pdf
(427 Kb)
PDF
Market Reaction to bank.pdf
(554 Kb)
PDF
Version
NA - Not Applicable (or Unknown)
You might also like
Pre-adoption market reaction to IFRS 9: A cross-country event-study
(2014)
Journal Article
Moral Hazard, Dividends, and Risk in Banks
(2014)
Journal Article
Long memory and multifractality: a joint test
(2016)
Journal Article
The real effects of banking supervision: Evidence from enforcement actions
(2016)
Journal Article
How should we estimate value-relevance models? Insights from European data
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: digital-library-support@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search