Jack Tomlin
Experiences of restrictiveness in forensic psychiatric care: systematic review and concept analysis
Tomlin, Jack; Bartlett, Peter; V�llm, Birgit
Authors
Professor PETER BARTLETT peter.bartlett@nottingham.ac.uk
NOTTINGHAM HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST PROFESSOR OF MENTAL HEALTH LAW
Birgit V�llm
Abstract
Mentally disordered offenders may be sent to secure psychiatric hospitals. These settings can resemble carceral spaces, employing high levels of security restricting resident autonomy, expression and social interaction. However, research exploring the restrictiveness of forensic settings is sparse. A systematic review was therefore undertaken to conceptualize this restrictiveness. Eight databases were searched for papers that address restrictive elements of secure forensic care in a non-cursory way. Fifty sources (empirical articles and policy documents) were included and subject to thematic analysis to identify 1) antecedent conditions to, 2) characteristic attributes, 3) consequences and 4) ‘deviant’ cases of the developing concept.
The restrictiveness of forensic care was experienced across three levels: individual, institutional and systemic. Restrictiveness was subjective and included such disparate elements as limited leave and grounds access, ownership of personal belongings and staff attitudes. The manner and extent to which these are experienced as restrictive was influenced by two antecedent conditions; whether the purpose of forensic care was to be more caring or custodial and the extent to which residents were perceived to be risky. We argue that there must be a reflexivity from stakeholders between the level of restrictiveness needed to safely provide care in a therapeutic milieu and enable the maximum amount of resident autonomy.
Citation
Tomlin, J., Bartlett, P., & Völlm, B. (2018). Experiences of restrictiveness in forensic psychiatric care: systematic review and concept analysis. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.12.006
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 18, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 30, 2018 |
Publication Date | Mar 30, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Feb 1, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 31, 2019 |
Journal | International Journal of Law and Psychiatry |
Print ISSN | 0160-2527 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-6386 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 57 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.12.006 |
Keywords | Forensic; Secure; Mental health; Restrictiveness; Autonomy |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/922304 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252717301802 |
Contract Date | Feb 1, 2018 |
Files
Revised Manuscript.pdf
(341 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
You might also like
Re-thinking the Mental Capacity Act 2005: Towards the Next Generation of Law
(2022)
Journal Article
Will and preferences in the overall CRPD project
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search