Tamara F.J. Fitters
Assessing water uptake in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) under different watering regimes
Fitters, Tamara F.J.; Bussell, Jennifer S.; Mooney, Sacha J.; Sparkes, Debbie L.
Authors
Jennifer S. Bussell
Professor SACHA MOONEY sacha.mooney@nottingham.ac.uk
Head of School (Professor of Soil Physics)
Debbie L. Sparkes
Abstract
Sugar beet yield worldwide is substantially reduced as a result of drought stress. Water uptake may be limited by the plant (e.g. low root density) or by soil physical constraints. An experiment was conducted to assess the ability of sugar beet to produce roots and take up water throughout the soil profile under contrasting water regimes. Sugar beet was grown in columns, 15 cm in diameter and 1 m height in a glasshouse. In situ soil moisture was monitored hourly, and stomatal conductance was measured weekly. Root length and diameter at different depths were assessed destructively at 78 and 94 DAS. Greater water availability resulted in a higher root length and lower water use efficiency. Water uptake was initially from the upper soil layers but, as demand for water increased, there was a strong increase in root length density at depth. However, it was a further 16 days, after roots reached the deep layers, before significant water was taken up. A possible reason for the delay, between presence of roots and water uptake by roots, was the absence of secondary xylem early on, which was supported by a second root anatomy study. Sugar beet can grow roots up to 1 m deep and take up water from depth, however this did not happen until the late stages of drought stress and thus storage root dry weight had already been severely reduced, indicating that prevention of drought is necessary, early on, to minimise yield losses.
Citation
Fitters, T. F., Bussell, J. S., Mooney, S. J., & Sparkes, D. L. (2017). Assessing water uptake in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) under different watering regimes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.001
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 1, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 12, 2017 |
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 3, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 13, 2018 |
Journal | Environmental and Experimental Botany |
Print ISSN | 0098-8472 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-7307 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 144 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.001 |
Keywords | Drought, Roots, Soil physical limitations, Stomatal conductance |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/897901 |
Publisher URL | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098847217302381?via%3Dihub |
Contract Date | Oct 3, 2017 |
Files
Drought paper revised TFitters.pdf
(810 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Future crop breeding needs to consider future soils
(2025)
Journal Article
Root-soil-microbiome management is key to the success of Regenerative Agriculture
(2024)
Journal Article