Stephanie Armstrong
Assessment of consent models as an ethical consideration in the conduct of prehospital ambulance randomised controlled clinical trials: a systematic review
Armstrong, Stephanie; Langlois, Adele; Laparidou, Despina; Dixon, Mark; Appleton, Jason P.; Bath, Philip M.W.; Snooks, Helen Anne; Siriwardena, A. Niroshan
Authors
Adele Langlois
Despina Laparidou
Mark Dixon
Jason P. Appleton
Professor PHILIP BATH philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk
STROKE ASSOCIATION PROFESSOR OF STROKE MEDICINE
Helen Anne Snooks
A. Niroshan Siriwardena
Abstract
Background
We sought to understand the main ethical considerations when conducting clinical trials in the prehospital ambulance based setting.
Methods
A systematic review of the literature on randomised controlled trials in ambulance settings was undertaken. A search of eight databases identified published studies involving recruitment of ambulance service users. Four independent authors undertook abstract and full-text reviews to determine eligibility and extract relevant data. The data extraction concentrated on ethical considerations, with any discussion of ethics being included for further analysis. The resultant data were combined to form a narrative synthesis.
Results
In all, 56 papers were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Issues relating to consent were the most significant theme identified. Type of consent differed depending on the condition or intervention being studied. The country in which the research took place did not appear to influence the type of consent, apart from the USA where exception from consent appeared to be most commonly used. A wide range of terms were used to describe consent.
Conclusions
Consent was the main ethical consideration in published ambulance based research. A range of consent models were used ranging from informed consent to exception from consent (waiver of consent). Many studies cited international guidelines as informing their choice of consent model but diverse and sometimes confused terms were used to describe these models. This suggests that standardisation of consent models and the terminology used to describe them is warranted.
Citation
Armstrong, S., Langlois, A., Laparidou, D., Dixon, M., Appleton, J. P., Bath, P. M., Snooks, H. A., & Siriwardena, A. N. (2017). Assessment of consent models as an ethical consideration in the conduct of prehospital ambulance randomised controlled clinical trials: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), Article 142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0423-4
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 7, 2017 |
Publication Date | Sep 16, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Sep 22, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 22, 2017 |
Journal | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Electronic ISSN | 1471-2288 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 17 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 142 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0423-4 |
Keywords | Ethics, Consent, Ambulance, Prehospital, Clinical trials |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/883101 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0423-4 |
Contract Date | Sep 22, 2017 |
Files
Consent s12874-017-0423-4.pdf
(623 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search