Professor NEIL SINCLAIR neil.sinclair@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY
Belief pills and the possibility of moral epistemology
Sinclair, Neil
Authors
Contributors
Russ Shafer-Landau
Editor
Abstract
I argue that evolutionary debunking arguments are dialectically ineffective against a range of plausible positions regarding moral truth. I first (§1) distinguish debunking arguments which target the truth of moral judgements from those which target their justification. I take the latter to rest on the premise that such judgements can be given evolutionary explanations which do not invoke their truth (§§2-3). The challenge for the debunker is to bridge the gap between this premise and the conclusion that moral judgements are unjustified. After briefly discussing older attempts to bridge this gap (§§4-5), I focus on Joyce’s recent attempt, which rests on the claim that ‘we do not have a believable account of how moral facts could explain the mechanisms and forces which give rise to moral judgements’ (§6). I argue that whether or not there is such an account depends on what it is permissible to assume about moral truth in this context. Further, I suggest that it is reasonable to make assumptions about moral truth which allow for the possibility of at least partial moral epistemologies (§6.2). The residual challenge for the debunker is to show that these assumptions are unreasonable in a way which doesn’t render their debunking argument superfluous.
Citation
Sinclair, N. (2018). Belief pills and the possibility of moral epistemology. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics. Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823841.001.0001
Book Type | Edited Book |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 15, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2018-07 |
Deposit Date | Sep 27, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 1, 2020 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Book Title | Oxford studies in metaethics |
Chapter Number | 5 |
ISBN | 9780198823841 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823841.001.0001 |
Keywords | Debunking arguments; Evolutionary ethics; Moral epistemology |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/878089 |
Publisher URL | https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780198823841.001.0001/oso-9780198823841 |
Contract Date | Sep 27, 2017 |
Files
Sinclair - Belief Pills and the Possibility of Moral Epistemology - final version.pdf
(310 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Metaethics and the Nature of Properties
(2024)
Journal Article
Speculative Aesthetic Expressivism
(2022)
Journal Article
The Evolutionary Debunking Of Quasi-realism
(2022)
Book Chapter
Practical expressivism
(2021)
Book
Moral Testimony As Higher-order Evidence
(2020)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search