Florian Schnabel
Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production
Schnabel, Florian; de Melo Virginio Filho, Elias; Xu, Su; Fisk, Ian D.; Roupsard, Olivier; Haggar, Jeremy
Authors
Elias de Melo Virginio Filho
Su Xu
Professor IAN FISK IAN.FISK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Flavour Science
Olivier Roupsard
Jeremy Haggar
Abstract
Greater understanding of the influences on long-term coffee productivity are needed to develop systems that are profitable, while maximizing ecosystem services and lowering negative environmental impacts. We examine a long-term experiment (15 years) established in Costa Rica in 2000 and compare intensive conventional (IC) coffee production under full sun with 19 agroforestry systems combining timber and service tree species with contrasting characteristics, with conventional and organic managements of different intensities. We assessed productivity through coffee yield and coffee morphological characteristics. IC had the highest productivity but had the highest yield bienniality; in the agroforestry systems productivity was similar for moderate conventional (MC) and intensive organic (IO) treatments (yield 5.3 vs 5.0 t/ha/year). Significantly lower yields were observed under shade than full sun, but coffee morphology was similar. Low input organic production (LO) declined to zero under the shade of the non-legume timber tree Terminalia amazonia but when legume tree species were chosen (Erythrina poepiggiana, Chloroleucon eurycyclum) LO coffee yield was not significantly different than for IO. For the first 6 years, coffee yield was higher under the shade of timber trees (Chloroleucon and Terminalia), while in the subsequent 7 years, Erythrina systems were more productive, presumably this is due to lower shade covers. If IC full sun plantations are not affordable or desired in the future, organic production is an interesting alternative with similar productivity to MC management and in LO systems incorporation of legume tree species is shown to be essential.
Citation
Schnabel, F., de Melo Virginio Filho, E., Xu, S., Fisk, I. D., Roupsard, O., & Haggar, J. (2018). Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production. Agroforestry Systems, 92(6), 1535-1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0100-y
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 3, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 13, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2018-12 |
Deposit Date | Jul 11, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 13, 2017 |
Journal | Agroforestry Systems |
Print ISSN | 0167-4366 |
Electronic ISSN | 1572-9680 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 92 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 1535-1549 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0100-y |
Keywords | Agroforestry systems; Coffee yield; Coffee morphology; Sustainable production; Shade trees; Biennial bearing |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/872370 |
Publisher URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10457-017-0100-y |
Additional Information | The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0100-y. |
Contract Date | Jul 11, 2017 |
Files
Shade trees a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee productionAAM.pdf
(713 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Esterification and volatile compound manipulation using radiofrequency cold plasma
(2024)
Journal Article
Digital Twins in Agriculture: Orchestration and Applications
(2024)
Journal Article
Tracking dry gin volatile organic compounds over distillation: a time course study
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search