Philip Miller
Use of conspicuity aids by cyclists and risk of crashes involving other road users: population based case-control study
Miller, Philip; Kendrick, Denise; Coupland, Carol; Coffey, Frank
Authors
Professor DENISE KENDRICK DENISE.KENDRICK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH
Professor CAROL COUPLAND carol.coupland@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF MEDICAL STATISTICS
Mr FRANK COFFEY frank.coffey@nottingham.ac.uk
CLINICAL CONSULTANT TO THE POSTGRADUATE CLINICAL SKILLS PROG
Abstract
Background: Cycling can improve health and well-being by reducing inactivity. Concern about collision crashes may be a barrier to participation since collision crashes can lead to significant mortality and morbidity. The conspicuity of cyclists may be a contributory factor in some collision crashes. This study investigated whether increased conspicuity aid use (such as reflective or fluorescent clothing) is associated with a reduced risk of collision crashes for cyclists in a UK city.
Methods: A matched case-control study was undertaken. Cases were adult cyclists involved in a collision crash causing injury. Controls were adult cyclists matched to cases by time of day, day of week and geographical area of travel. Exposures, potential confounders and route were reported by participants. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using conditional logistic regression.
Results: 76 cases and 272 controls were included. 69.7% of cases and 65.4% of controls reported using a conspicuity aid on the crash (cases) or index (controls) journey. The unadjusted OR for a collision crash when using any conspicuity aid vs none was 1.2 (95% CI 0.7 to 2.2) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.6) after adjustment for age, gender, index of multiple deprivation score, route risk score and previous bicycle crash.
Conclusion: This study found no evidence that cyclists using conspicuity aids were at reduced risk of a collision crash compared to non-users after adjustment for confounding, but there was some evidence of an increase in risk. Bias and residual confounding from differing route selection and cycling behaviours in users of conspicuity aids are possible explanations for these findings. Conspicuity aids may not be effective in reducing collision crash risk for cyclists in highly-motorised environments when used in the absence of other bicycle crash prevention measures such as increased segregation or lower motor vehicle speeds.
Citation
Miller, P., Kendrick, D., Coupland, C., & Coffey, F. (in press). Use of conspicuity aids by cyclists and risk of crashes involving other road users: population based case-control study. Journal of Transport and Health, 7(A), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.03.008
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 17, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 22, 2017 |
Deposit Date | May 10, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 23, 2018 |
Journal | Journal of Transport & Health |
Electronic ISSN | 2214-1405 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 7 |
Issue | A |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.03.008 |
Keywords | Road traffic injury; Vulnerable road user; Conspicuity; Bicycle; Injury prevention |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/851922 |
Publisher URL | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140516303796 |
Contract Date | May 10, 2017 |
Files
P Miller AAM J Trans Health Mar 2017.pdf
(500 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
You might also like
Attitudes and current practice in alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral for treatment among staff working in urgent and emergency settings: a survey
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search