Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Use of conspicuity aids by cyclists and risk of crashes involving other road users: population based case-control study

Miller, Philip; Kendrick, Denise; Coupland, Carol; Coffey, Frank

Authors

Philip Miller

DENISE KENDRICK DENISE.KENDRICK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Primary Care Research

CAROL COUPLAND carol.coupland@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Medical Statistics

FRANK COFFEY frank.coffey@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Consultant To The Postgraduate Clinical Skills Prog



Abstract

Background: Cycling can improve health and well-being by reducing inactivity. Concern about collision crashes may be a barrier to participation since collision crashes can lead to significant mortality and morbidity. The conspicuity of cyclists may be a contributory factor in some collision crashes. This study investigated whether increased conspicuity aid use (such as reflective or fluorescent clothing) is associated with a reduced risk of collision crashes for cyclists in a UK city.

Methods: A matched case-control study was undertaken. Cases were adult cyclists involved in a collision crash causing injury. Controls were adult cyclists matched to cases by time of day, day of week and geographical area of travel. Exposures, potential confounders and route were reported by participants. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using conditional logistic regression.

Results: 76 cases and 272 controls were included. 69.7% of cases and 65.4% of controls reported using a conspicuity aid on the crash (cases) or index (controls) journey. The unadjusted OR for a collision crash when using any conspicuity aid vs none was 1.2 (95% CI 0.7 to 2.2) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.6) after adjustment for age, gender, index of multiple deprivation score, route risk score and previous bicycle crash.

Conclusion: This study found no evidence that cyclists using conspicuity aids were at reduced risk of a collision crash compared to non-users after adjustment for confounding, but there was some evidence of an increase in risk. Bias and residual confounding from differing route selection and cycling behaviours in users of conspicuity aids are possible explanations for these findings. Conspicuity aids may not be effective in reducing collision crash risk for cyclists in highly-motorised environments when used in the absence of other bicycle crash prevention measures such as increased segregation or lower motor vehicle speeds.

Citation

Miller, P., Kendrick, D., Coupland, C., & Coffey, F. (in press). Use of conspicuity aids by cyclists and risk of crashes involving other road users: population based case-control study. Journal of Transport and Health, 7(A), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.03.008

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 17, 2017
Online Publication Date Mar 22, 2017
Deposit Date May 10, 2017
Publicly Available Date Sep 23, 2018
Journal Journal of Transport & Health
Electronic ISSN 2214-1405
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 7
Issue A
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.03.008
Keywords Road traffic injury; Vulnerable road user; Conspicuity;
Bicycle; Injury prevention
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/851922
Publisher URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140516303796

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations